Discover & Read Articles Without Distractions

Find and explore trending articles from around the web in a clutter-free reading mode.

Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features
  • Law

    Supreme Court leaves New York law requiring ‘good moral character’ to carry handguns in place | CNN Politics

    cnn.com Law USA

    The Supreme Court declined to review a New York law requiring "good moral character" for handgun permits, leaving in place restrictions on carrying weapons in sensitive locations.

    FAST FACTS: Know the difference between commonly confused legal terms

    rappler.com Law Philippines

    This article clarifies the differences between commonly confused legal terms such as life imprisonment and reclusion perpetua, amnesty and pardon, and parole and probation.

    Know The Law | Distinction Between Gift/Settlement Deed & Will : Supreme Court Explains

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India clarified the distinctions between gift deeds, settlement deeds, and wills, emphasizing the timing of property transfer as the key differentiator.

    Kunal Kamra moves Madras High Court seeking inter-State anticipatory bail - The Hindu

    thehindu.com Law India

    Stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra seeks inter-state anticipatory bail from the Madras High Court after receiving death threats following a police complaint in Mumbai.

    Substantive Objections On Validity Or Existence Of Arbitration Agreement Can Be Adjudicated By Tribunal U/S 16 Of Act: Bombay HC

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Bombay High Court ruled that the arbitral tribunal, not the court, should adjudicate substantive objections to the validity of an arbitration agreement under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

    Daniela Klette: Ex-RAF-Frau bereut nichts – Schimpftirade vor Gericht

    nzz.ch Law Germany

    Former Red Army Faction (RAF) member Daniela Klette faces trial in Celle, Germany, for armed robberies, showing no remorse and launching into a tirade against the justice system and perceived enemies.

    New dog walking rules in France: Keep your pet on a lead from April 15

    connexionfrance.com Law France

    Starting April 15th, new French laws require dogs to be leashed outside designated paths in wooded areas to protect wildlife during breeding season, with fines up to €750 for violations.

    Costa Concordia, Schettino rinuncia per ora alla semilibertà - Notizie - Ansa.it

    ansa.it Law Italy

    Francesco Schettino, the former captain of the Costa Concordia, withdrew his request for semilibertà due to difficulties with a proposed job opportunity.

    The Supreme Court’s awful new deportation decision, explained | Vox

    vox.com Law United States

    The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision allows the Trump administration to resume deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, but requires notice and a chance to challenge removal, raising concerns about due process and potential bias in the Fifth Circuit.

    A Swastika, a Tesla and a Debate Over the Limits of Hate Crime Law - The New York Times

    nytimes.com Law USA

    The vandalism of Teslas with swastikas sparks debate over whether it constitutes a hate crime against Elon Musk or a broader expression of antisemitism.

    WB SSC Scam | Supreme Court Sets Aside Calcutta HC Direction For CBI Investigation Into Govt Decision For Supernumerary Posts

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India overturned a Calcutta High Court order mandating a CBI investigation into the creation of supernumerary posts by the West Bengal government to accommodate allegedly illegal appointees in the 2016 WB SSC recruitment scandal.

    Writ Courts Can Suo Motu Strike Down Subordinate Legislation : Supreme Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India affirmed the power of Writ Courts to strike down subordinate legislation violating fundamental rights, even suo motu, but cautioned against its frequent use.

    A $4 Billion Sex Abuse Settlement in L.A., After Childhoods of ‘Pure Hell’ - The New York Times

    nytimes.com Law United States

    Los Angeles County will pay $4 billion to settle lawsuits from thousands of people who allege they were sexually abused as children in county foster care and juvenile detention systems.

    Supreme Court allows Trump to enforce Alien Enemies Act for rapid deportations for now | CNN Politics

    cnn.com Law World

    The Supreme Court temporarily allowed the Trump administration to use the Alien Enemies Act for expedited deportations, but mandated adequate notice and review opportunities for affected individuals.

    ‘Veel mensen geven signaal dat ze dit niet meer pikken’: boosheid en verontwaardiging nu verkrachter straf ontloopt | De Morgen

    demorgen.be Law Belgium

    Public outrage erupts in Belgium after a rapist avoids punishment due to his promising career prospects, sparking a debate about class justice and the handling of sexual assault cases.

    Patentanwalt beleidigt Nachbarn: Gerichtsverhandlung in Laufen

    chiemgau24.de Law Germany

    A patent lawyer in Laufen, Germany, faces trial for insulting his neighbor, leading to a heated courtroom exchange and accusations of ongoing disputes.

    Tasma Walton: Judge rules that actor is Indigenous and ‘an honest witness’ in native title case

    theage.com.au Law Australia

    A judge ruled that Australian actor Tasma Walton is Indigenous and a credible witness in a native title case, relying on oral traditions to support her claim despite challenges from opposing parties.

    Cidadania italiana: saiba tudo o que muda com as novas regras | GZH

    gauchazh.clicrbs.com.br Law Brazil

    New Italian citizenship laws restrict eligibility to two generations and impact thousands of Brazilians seeking citizenship.

    Dani Alves, un caso endiablado | Opinión | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    This opinion piece analyzes the controversial Dani Alves trial, highlighting the complexities of the legal process, the importance of the presumption of innocence, and the need for support for those affected by such cases, regardless of the outcome.

    Dismissed PMA cadet Cudia's case 'closed and terminated'

    rappler.com Law Philippines

    The Supreme Court in the Philippines has finally denied the dismissed PMA cadet Jeff Aldrin Cudia's third appeal, concluding his case and upholding his dismissal from the academy for violating the honor code.

    Draft Arbitration And Conciliation Amendment Bill 2024, ADR, Appellate Arbitral Tribunals, American Arbitration Association, European Court of Arbitration, emergency arbitration, Ministry of Finance, Kochhar & Co

    livelaw.in Law India

    India's Draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2024, aims to modernize arbitration practices but faces criticism over its potential impact on foreign investment and its unclear provisions on interim relief and time limits.

    Elon Musk’s X sues union government over alleged censorship and IT Act violations - The Hindu

    thehindu.com Law India

    Elon Musk's X (formerly Twitter) filed a lawsuit in India challenging the government's content regulation and censorship practices, claiming violations of free speech and due process.

    Justiça condena aluno da UFRGS a prisão por racismo contra coordenador do MBL | GZH

    gauchazh.clicrbs.com.br Law Brazil

    A Brazilian court sentenced Álvaro Körbes Hauschild to prison for racist remarks made online against a student coordinator.

    Prosecution Under UP Gangsters Act Permissible Even In Case Of A Single FIR/Charge-sheet for Anti-Social Activities: Supreme Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India ruled that prosecution under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, is permissible even with a single FIR or charge sheet if the crime involves anti-social activities as defined in the Act.

    Stap voor stap lijken we collectief onze rechtsstaat te ondermijnen | De Morgen

    demorgen.be Law Belgium

    A controversial court decision in Belgium, where a medical student was acquitted of rape, sparks a debate about the justice system's shortcomings and societal biases.

    When Can Entire Selection Process Be Set Aside For Irregularities? Supreme Court Lays Down 4 Key Principles

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India established four key principles for determining when an entire selection process should be nullified due to irregularities, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation and considering the balance between upholding process integrity and avoiding undue hardship to unaffected candidates.

    Succession and administration of estate

    blog.ipleaders.in Law India

    This article explains the process of estate administration and succession under Islamic law in India, including the roles of executors and administrators, and the impact of the Uniform Civil Code.

    I can see my neighbour sunbathing naked in his back garden. Is he breaking the law? DEAN DUNHAM has the answer | This is Money

    thisismoney.co.uk Law UK

    A legal expert answers whether a neighbor sunbathing naked in their garden is breaking the law, considering intent, distress caused, and potential legal recourse.

    Warning over disturbing sex trend as expert blasts life-changing risks - what you NEED to know | The Scottish Sun

    thescottishsun.co.uk Law Scotland

    Recent landmark prosecutions in Scotland highlight the criminalization of 'stealthing,' the non-consensual removal of a condom during sex, emphasizing the importance of consent and raising awareness of underreported sexual assaults.

    Federal prosecutors announce more charges against Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs | CNN

    cnn.com Law USA

    Federal prosecutors have added two more charges against Sean "Diddy" Combs, bringing the total to five, just one month before his sex trafficking trial.

    Conde-Pumpido se queda solo en su maniobra para evitar que Europa le examine

    abc.es Law Spain

    Internal reports contradict Spanish Constitutional Court President Conde-Pumpido's attempt to prevent a referral to the European Court of Justice regarding the court's 'amnesty' in the ERE case.

    SCOTUS Backs Trump — for Now — on Alien Enemies Act | The New York Sun

    nysun.com Law World

    The Supreme Court temporarily sided with Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act for deporting Venezuelan gang members, but the decision leaves the broader legality of the act unresolved.

    Prison chiefs accused of blocking mother jailed for social media post from seeing daughter

    telegraph.co.uk Law UK

    A jailed mother is being prevented from seeing her daughter, allegedly due to prison officials' concerns about social media and public attention.

    Trump’s tariffs sure look illegal. Will the Supreme Court stop them?

    slate.com Law World

    The legality of President Trump's tariffs is challenged, raising questions about executive authority and the potential for Supreme Court intervention.

    Doctrine of reasonable classification - iPleaders

    blog.ipleaders.in Law India

    This article provides a comprehensive explanation of the doctrine of reasonable classification in Indian constitutional law, outlining its concept, scope, and significance.

    Justice Nariman's Revival Of Doctrine Of "Manifest Arbitrariness" To Strike Down Legislation

    livelaw.in Law India

    Justice Nariman's revival of the doctrine of 'manifest arbitrariness' has significantly impacted Indian constitutional law, leading to the striking down of several legislative provisions deemed unreasonable or discriminatory.

    El casar se va a acabar | La Rioja

    larioja.com Law Spain

    A recent law reform in La Rioja, Spain, eliminates the ability of justices of the peace to officiate civil weddings, impacting couples who preferred their impartiality.

    ‘Like a Pied Piper’: Children were attracted to me, says alleged school predator

    smh.com.au Law Australia

    A former Australian teacher is on trial for multiple counts of child sexual abuse, with the prosecution arguing he hid his predatory behavior in plain sight while his defense claims he is a victim of long-standing rumors.

    Supreme Court Won’t Hear Challenge to New York State Gun Law | The Epoch Times

    theepochtimes.com Law USA

    The Supreme Court's refusal to hear a challenge to New York's restrictive gun law upholds a lower court decision that partially struck down but largely affirmed the law's provisions.

    El juez Peinado ignora durante meses los recursos contra sus decisiones en el ‘caso Begoña Gómez’ | España | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    Judge Juan Carlos Peinado's handling of the Begoña Gómez case has drawn heavy criticism for his months-long delays in addressing appeals and his questionable procedural practices.

    Judge Boasberg Cancels Hearing After SCOTUS Vacates His Orders | The Epoch Times

    theepochtimes.com Law USA

    The Supreme Court's decision to vacate a lower court's orders blocking the deportation of Venezuelan gang members led to the cancellation of a hearing and a shift in the legal proceedings.

    Contratos de trabajo | Periodo de prueba extendido sin razón válida: lo que podría pasar con tu contrato | empresa | trabajador | estabilidad laboral | despido | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

    gestion.pe Law Peru

    A Peruvian Supreme Court case highlights the importance of properly justifying extended probationary periods in employment contracts, emphasizing the need for clear evidence of complexity and specialized training.

    Indecopi ratifica plazo de un año para independización de inmuebles ¿qué considerar? | departamentos | titulo de propiedad | | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

    gestion.pe Law Peru

    Peru's Indecopi has established a one-year timeframe for completing property title independent, clarifying that this is the reasonable time frame if no timeframe is specified in the contract.

    Inmuebles: dueños son responsabilizados por actos ilegales de inquilinos: ¿es posible? | alquiler de inmuebles | departamentos | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

    gestion.pe Law Peru

    A new municipal ordinance in San Juan de Miraflores, Peru, holds property owners responsible for illegal activities of their tenants, sparking debate about its legality and potential impact.

    Vacaciones en venta: ¿Es posible ceder días de descanso a cambio de dinero? | compensación | empleo | laboral | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

    gestion.pe Law Peru

    Peruvian labor law allows employees to sell up to 15 vacation days, but only under specific conditions and with employer consent; failure to take vacation within the established period results in triple compensation.

    Actos de violencia fuera del trabajo como motivo suficiente para un despido | Falta grave | Corte Suprema | Reputación | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

    gestion.pe Law Peru

    The Peruvian Supreme Court ruled that an employee's violent actions outside of work constituted grounds for dismissal, emphasizing the impact on employer trust and company reputation.

    Miraflores | Bares y restaurantes se “libran” de exigencias ilegales, ¿de qué se trata? | seguridad | armas | ordenanza | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

    gestion.pe Law Peru

    A Peruvian court ruled that Miraflores municipality's regulations on bars and restaurants, requiring weapon detectors and staff training, were illegal due to exceeding their legal authority.

    Indecopi | Cuidado con el uso de imágenes: lo que puede costar no pedir permiso | derechos de autor | municipalidad | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

    gestion.pe Law Peru

    A Peruvian municipality was fined by Indecopi for unauthorized use of a photograph in its public promotions, highlighting the importance of obtaining consent and paying royalties for copyrighted material.

    Construir sin licencia: las implicancias legales que podrían llevar a prisión | viviendas | inmueble | edificaciones | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

    gestion.pe Law Peru

    A Peruvian court case highlights the legal consequences of unlicensed construction, emphasizing the importance of adhering to urban regulations, especially in protected areas, with potential prison sentences for significant violations.

    Miraflores y el comercio ambulatorio: Indecopi aclara situación en el distrito | Barreras burocráticas | Heladeros | ordenanzas | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

    gestion.pe Law Peru

    Indecopi ruled against Miraflores' restrictions on itinerant street vendors, declaring them illegal and highlighting the need for consistent provincial regulations.

    SAP Alicante 596/2024, 29 de Noviembre de 2024 - Jurisprudencia - VLEX 1068890248

    vlex.es Law Spain

    This legal document details an appeal in a Spanish court regarding a lawsuit concerning the impugnation of corporate agreements and inheritance issues within a family-owned company.

    DOJ Says Judge Lacks Authority to Demand US Return Deported Alleged Gang Member | The Epoch Times

    theepochtimes.com Law United States

    The Department of Justice argues a Maryland judge lacks authority to order the return of a deported alleged gang member from El Salvador, prompting a legal battle.

    Rachel Sheherazade perde processo que movia contra SBT - 11/03/2025 - Outro Canal - F5

    f5.folha.uol.com.br Law Brazil

    A Brazilian court has definitively ruled against Rachel Sheherazade in her lawsuit against SBT, dismissing her claims and ordering her to pay legal fees.

    Trump deportation: Judge orders return of man mistakenly sent to notorious El Salvador prison

    smh.com.au Law United States

    A federal judge ordered the return of a Salvadoran man mistakenly deported to a notorious prison in El Salvador, criticizing the Trump administration's actions as 'wholly lawless'.

    Gerichtsverhandlung in Salzburg nimmt überraschende Wendung: Angeklagter droht Richterin

    chiemgau24.de Law Austria

    A 48-year-old Austrian man received a suspended sentence for threatening a judge during a court hearing in Salzburg.

    Specific Performance Suit Not Maintainable For Cancelled Sale Agreement Without Seeking Declaration Against Cancellation : Supreme Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India ruled that a suit for specific performance of a cancelled sale agreement is not maintainable without a prior declaration challenging the cancellation's validity.

    Fernando Madureira tinha saco de papel com 31 mil euros debaixo da cama | Justiça | PÚBLICO

    publico.pt Law Portugal

    During a raid related to Operation Pretorian, authorities found over €31,000 in cash hidden under the bed of Fernando Madureira, former leader of the Super Dragões fan group.

    Wife Can Be Affected By Defamation Of Husband; Apart From Individual Reputations, Spouses Share Common Family Reputation : Supreme Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India ruled that a wife's reputation can be harmed by defamation against her husband, acknowledging the concept of a shared 'family reputation'.

    Land Acquisition Act | Supreme Court Explains Principle Of De-Escalation, Says Highest Of Sale Exemplars Must Be Taken

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India upheld the principle of using the highest sale exemplar for land acquisition compensation, increasing the award for land acquired in Haryana.

    Bianca Santana: Brasil cria importante precedente jurídico - 06/04/2025 - Bianca Santana - Folha

    www1.folha.uol.com.br Law Brazil

    The Brazilian justice system's final confirmation of Juan Darthés's conviction for raping Thelma Fardin sets a significant legal precedent, prioritizing the victim's testimony in sexual assault cases.

    Investigações sobre venda de decisões atingem 14 tribunais - 07/04/2025 - Poder - Folha

    www1.folha.uol.com.br Law Brazil

    Investigations into the sale of judicial decisions in Brazil have implicated at least 14 courts, involving judges, staff, and even relatives, highlighting the systemic nature of corruption within the judiciary.

    Ordenan embargo de lujoso departamento de Hermosilla - La Tercera

    latercera.com Law Chile

    A Chilean court has ordered the seizure of a luxury apartment belonging to lawyer Luis Hermosilla due to significant unpaid debts to Scotiabank.

    Rungnapha Kanbut sex slavery trial: Juror discharged after bringing knife to court

    smh.com.au Law Australia

    A juror in the Rungnapha Kanbut sex slavery trial was discharged after bringing a knife to court and attempting to engage in conversation with the judge's associate.

    Zivilcourage mit Folgen: Vom Retter zum Beschuldigten in Zürich - Blick

    blick.ch Law Switzerland

    A Good Samaritan in Zurich, Switzerland, who intervened in an assault, faces legal charges himself after the attacker filed a counter-complaint.

    Could Trump’s ‘Path of Perfect Lawlessness’ Set Him on a Collision Course With Chief Justice Roberts and the Supreme Court? | The New York Sun

    nysun.com Law World

    A Fourth Circuit Court rebuke of the Trump administration's deportation tactics highlights a potential conflict between the executive and judicial branches, potentially leading to a Supreme Court confrontation.

    Wilson Sonsini Partner Trio Takes Team to Baker McKenzie Following Beijing Closure

    law.com Law China

    A group of senior lawyers from Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati's Hong Kong office, including its Greater China capital markets head, has joined Baker McKenzie's FenXun Partners in Greater China.

    Norfolk police officer 'dressed inappropriately with victim' | Beccles & Bungay Journal

    becclesandbungayjournal.co.uk Law England

    Two Norfolk police officers face misconduct hearings; one for inappropriate behavior during a victim interview, the other for alleged phone misuse and unlawful search.

    El youtuber que llamó 'caranchoa' a un repartidor, condenado a indemnizarle con 20.000 euros por daños morales

    eldiario.es Law Spain

    A Spanish court upheld a ruling ordering a former YouTuber to pay €20,000 in moral damages to a delivery worker he insulted and filmed without consent.

    Alves, Le Pen y los malditos jueces, por Javier Melero

    lavanguardia.com Law World

    The article analyzes the differing public reactions to the legal cases of Dani Alves and Marine Le Pen, highlighting the tension between legal processes and their societal impact.

    Delhi HC sets aside order dismissing to take on record certificate under Section 65-B of IEA | SCC Times

    scconline.com Law India

    The Delhi High Court overturned a lower court's dismissal of a certificate under Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act, deeming its rejection a hyper-technical procedural error.

    2008 Bangalore Blasts Case | Supreme Court Allows Section 65B Evidence Act Certificate at Any Trial Stage

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India ruled that a Section 65B certificate for electronic evidence can be submitted at any stage of a trial, overturning a Karnataka High Court decision in the 2008 Bangalore Blasts case.

    Need To Introspect Why Many Women Are Unwilling To Continue In Legal Profession: Justice BV Nagarathna

    livelaw.in Law India

    Supreme Court Justice BV Nagarathna highlights the need for introspection within the legal field to understand why many women leave the profession, emphasizing the impact of gendered prejudices and systemic issues.

    Arbitral Tribunal Can Proceed Against Party Though They Weren't Served With S.21 Notice Or Made Party In S.11 Application : Supreme Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India ruled that not being served a Section 21 notice or included in a Section 11 application doesn't prevent someone from being added to arbitration proceedings if they are party to the arbitration agreement.

    What Recourse Does the Supreme Court Actually Have? - The Atlantic

    theatlantic.com Law United States

    Federal judges are considering using contempt of court charges against the Trump administration for defying court orders regarding the deportation of migrants.

    CFPB preliminary injunction likely modified by appeals panel | American Banker

    americanbanker.com Law United States

    A federal appeals panel is considering modifying a preliminary injunction against the Trump administration's attempts to dismantle the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

    CDE rechaza demanda de Patio Bellavista contra el Fisco y niega existencia de “zona de sacrificio” - La Tercera

    latercera.com Law Chile

    The Chilean State Defense Council (CDE) rejected a lawsuit filed by Patio Bellavista against the government, arguing the claim is time-barred and denying the existence of a "sacrifice zone".

    Law firm Aird & Berlis opens Vancouver office - The Globe and Mail

    theglobeandmail.com Law Canada

    Aird & Berlis LLP, a Toronto-based law firm, expands its operations by opening a new office in Vancouver, fueled by the growth of its Indigenous law practice group.

    Sudac Mirko Živić priveden sucu istrage | Telegram.hr

    telegram.hr Law Croatia

    A Croatian judge, Mirko Živić, was arrested and is under investigation for allegedly forging documents related to a Moldovan citizen's extended detention.

    El exdirector de Ciencias Forenses avisa a la Fiscalía de un error científico en la absolución de Dani Alves | Sociedad | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    A former director of Spain's National Institute of Toxicology and Forensic Sciences claims a scientific error in the acquittal of Dani Alves on sexual assault charges.

    Práctica MODELO Solicita Atribución Del Cuidado Personal Unilateral | PDF | Caso de ley | Justicia

    es.scribd.com Law Argentina

    A legal document in Argentina requests unilateral child custody due to the mother's prolonged absence and the negative impact on the child.

    Inicia Demanda Por Cuidado Personal Unilateral de Los Hijos. Acredita Mediación | PDF | Instituciones sociales | Ciencias sociales

    es.scribd.com Law Argentina

    A father in Argentina is filing for sole custody of his children due to alleged physical abuse by their mother and her partner, supported by a mediation attempt.

    Quale Ufficio territoriale dell’Agenzia può stare in giudizio? - Euroconference News

    ecnews.it Law Italy

    Two recent Italian Supreme Court rulings clarify which territorial office of the Agenzia delle Entrate can be a party in tax litigation, emphasizing the agency's unified nature and the principle of effective judicial protection.

    S.12 DV Act | Mother-In-Law Harassed Or Tortured By Daughter-In-Law Can File Complaint To Magistrate For Relief: Allahabad High Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Allahabad High Court ruled that a mother-in-law who experiences harassment or torture from her daughter-in-law can file a complaint under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.

    Muertos dana | Una acusación popular en la dana afirma que hay certificados de defunción con la fecha equivocada | Las Provincias

    lasprovincias.es Law Spain

    A popular accusation in the Dana case in Valencia, Spain, alleges that some death certificates have incorrect dates, raising questions about the official handling of the flood victims.

    Llegó por una emergencia obstétrica y salió con antecedentes penales: así funciona el proceso por aborto en el Perú | ECDATA | EL COMERCIO PERÚ

    elcomercio.pe Law Peru

    This article details the devastating effects of Peru's criminalization of abortion on women, highlighting the disproportionate impact on vulnerable populations and the role of healthcare professionals in perpetuating the issue.

    Justice Sanjeev Kumar appointed as acting Chief Justice of Jammu & Kashmir High Court - The Hindu

    thehindu.com Law India

    Justice Sanjeev Kumar has been appointed as the acting Chief Justice of the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court following the retirement of the incumbent.

    [Section 216 CrPC] Court Can Add Or Alter Charges At Any Time, Even After Reserving Judgment: SC [Read Judgment]

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India clarified that courts can alter or add charges under Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure even after reserving judgment, ensuring a fair trial without causing undue prejudice to the accused.

    Judge rules for Ryan Walters in defamation suit filed by former teacher

    oklahoman.com Law Oklahoma

    A federal judge ruled in favor of Oklahoma schools Superintendent Ryan Walters in a defamation lawsuit filed by a former teacher, Summer Boismier, who protested a state law restricting classroom discussions on race and gender.

    Restraining order sought against Glenna Bevin by adopted son | Lexington Herald Leader

    kentucky.com Law Kentucky

    Jonah Bevin, adopted son of former Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin, seeks a restraining order against his adoptive mother, Glenna Bevin, to obtain documents related to his Ethiopian biological family.

    Trump Administration: Live Updates and Latest News - The New York Times

    nytimes.com Law World

    The Supreme Court partially sided with a lower court's order to facilitate the return of a Salvadoran migrant wrongly deported by the Trump administration, prompting debate over executive branch authority and the rule of law.

    Meta goes to trial to avoid a breakup | The Verge

    theverge.com Law United States

    Meta is facing a crucial antitrust trial where the FTC alleges that its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp were anti-competitive, potentially leading to a company breakup.

    Supreme Court Sides With Migrant Trump Administration Wrongly Deported - The New York Times

    nytimes.com Law World

    The Supreme Court ruled that the government must facilitate the return of a Salvadoran migrant wrongly deported by the Trump administration, but stopped short of directly ordering it.

    Former Ma Kelly's boss and accountant on trial at Preston Crown Court over fraud charges

    blackpoolgazette.co.uk Law England

    The former owner of the Ma Kelly's bar chain and his accountant are on trial at Preston Crown Court, facing multi-million pound fraud charges related to alleged tax evasion.

    Family Wins Suit Against Conspiracist Who Called Manchester Bombing a Hoax - The New York Times

    nytimes.com Law England

    A British court ruled that a conspiracy theorist who falsely claimed the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing was a hoax must pay damages to the Hibbert family, who were severely injured in the attack.

    Court rules congregation can be evicted from R.I.'s Touro Synagogue

    bostonglobe.com Law Rhode Island

    A Rhode Island court ruled that Congregation Jeshuat Israel must be evicted from the Touro Synagogue, ending a long-standing legal battle between two congregations.

    Delhi High Court Verdict In Airports Authority Of India Case Is A Renewed Call To Uphold The Spirit Of The Arbitration Act

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Delhi High Court's recent upholding of an arbitral award in the Airports Authority of India case reinforces the importance of minimal judicial intervention in arbitration, promoting confidence in India's arbitration process.

    Hashem Abedi denies assaulting 'filthy pig' prison officer

    telegraph.co.uk Law World

    Hashem Abedi and Ahmed Hassan, both facing assault charges, pleaded not guilty in court, with Hassan expressing strong religious objections to the proceedings.

    Conor McGregor plans to call two new witnesses in civil rape case | Irish Independent

    independent.ie Law World

    Conor McGregor's legal team plans to present affidavits from two new witnesses who claim to have seen or heard another man assaulting Nikita Hand on the night of December 9, 2018.

    Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll - The Washington Post

    washingtonpost.com Law USA

    A judge clarified that the jury's finding of sexual abuse against Donald Trump in the E. Jean Carroll case constitutes rape under a broader, commonly understood definition.

    El Tribunal Superior vasco anula el artículo que obliga a tener contrato de alquiler o ser propietario para percibir la RGI | El Correo

    elcorreo.com Law Spain

    The Basque Country's Superior Court of Justice annulled a regulation requiring rental contracts or property ownership to receive the RGI (Guaranteed Income), impacting access to social welfare.

    Gorbe v. City of Lathrup Vill. - Case Brief Summary for Law School Success

    studicata.com Law USA

    Three Lathrup Village police officers sued the city for age, race, and disability discrimination and retaliation, resulting in a mixed outcome in court.

    Communication Blockade And Curbs On Media Freedom In Kashmir: Foundation for Media Professionals Moves SC

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Foundation for Media Professionals (FMP) filed an intervention application with the Supreme Court of India supporting a petition challenging communication blockades and media restrictions in Kashmir.

    Freedom Of Expression Doesn't Give Citizens The Right To Speak Sans Responsibility On Social Media: Allahabad High Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Allahabad High Court ruled that freedom of expression on social media does not absolve individuals from responsibility for their words, upholding a case against a woman accused of online abuse.

    Safe Harbor: Bridge To Innovation Amidst The Waters Of Liability?

    livelaw.in Law World

    Safe harbor provisions, legal immunities for online platforms hosting user-generated content, are analyzed across various jurisdictions, highlighting the global debate on balancing innovation and accountability.

    What's In A Name? A Lot, Especially If That Name Is "Anti-National"

    livelaw.in Law India

    This article analyzes the ambiguous use of the term "anti-national" in Indian law, highlighting its lack of clear definition and potential for arbitrary application.

    "Media Shall Be Made Accountable For Hate Speech, Fake News, Breach of Privacy": Plea In Supreme Court Seeks Establishment Of Media Tribunal

    livelaw.in Law India

    A film producer has petitioned the Indian Supreme Court to establish a Media Tribunal to regulate misinformation, hate speech, and breaches of privacy in media.

    Section 377 is gone, but some fear the proposed Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita does not protect men against rape. This is why. | Explained News - The Indian Express

    indianexpress.com Law India

    The proposed Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita's omission of provisions protecting men from rape raises concerns about legal recourse for male victims of sexual assault in India.

    Ryan Reynolds says Justin Baldoni can’t sue over ‘hurt feelings’ after alleged Deadpool diss | The Independent

    independent.co.uk Law World

    Ryan Reynolds is attempting to dismiss Justin Baldoni's lawsuit, claiming Baldoni's complaints are based on 'hurt feelings' rather than provable defamation.

    Juiz que forjou nome de britânico e vai brigar por salário - 18/04/2025 - Cotidiano - Folha

    www1.folha.uol.com.br Law Brazil

    A retired Brazilian judge, who used a false British identity for 45 years, is fighting to regain his pension while facing charges of false representation.

    The Supreme Court case that seeks to make everyone’s health insurance worse, Kennedy v. Braidwood Management | Vox

    vox.com Law United States

    The Supreme Court case, Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, challenges the Department of Health and Human Services' authority to mandate preventative health coverage under the Affordable Care Act, potentially impacting access to crucial treatments.

    Pa. Supreme Court asked to replace judge in suspended trooper’s vehicular homicide case - pennlive.com

    pennlive.com Law Pennsylvania

    A Pennsylvania state trooper convicted of vehicular homicide is petitioning the state Supreme Court to overturn the verdict due to alleged juror misconduct and replace the presiding judge.

    Application Seeking Recall Of Compromise Decree Can Be Filed Before The Court Which Granted It : Supreme Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India ruled that an application to recall a compromise decree due to fraud can be filed before the court that issued the decree.

    Property Seized By ED Must Be Returned If PMLA Probe Continues Beyond 365 Days And Does Not Result In Any Proceedings: Delhi High Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Delhi High Court ruled that property seized by the Enforcement Directorate under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act must be returned if the investigation exceeds 365 days without resulting in any proceedings.

    "Reasons To Believe": A System Of Checks & Balances On The Powers Of The Enforcement Directorate Under PMLA, 2002

    livelaw.in Law India

    The article analyzes the legal requirements and judicial interpretations of the 'reasons to believe' clause within India's Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, highlighting its role as a check on the Enforcement Directorate's powers.

    Important Judgments Of Madras High Court 2022

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Madras High Court delivered 525 significant judgments in 2022, covering diverse legal issues impacting various aspects of Indian society.

    Cloud Particle Scam: Punjab & Haryana HC Refuses To De-Freeze Accused Company's Accounts, Rejects Claims Against ED Search & Seizure

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld the Enforcement Directorate's seizure of assets from Vuenow Infotech Pvt. Ltd., rejecting the company's challenge to the investigation of its alleged involvement in a cloud particle investment scam.

    ED's Power Under PML Act Rests On The Quartet-Test Of 'Search', 'Seize', 'Proceeds Of Crime' & 'Money-Laundering': Calcutta High Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Calcutta High Court clarified the Enforcement Directorate's powers under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, emphasizing the necessity of a 'quartet-test' involving search, seizure, proceeds of crime, and money-laundering for legal action.

    Without Proving Knowledge About Proceeds Of Crime, Can Money Laundering Be Presumed? Supreme Court Asks ED

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India questioned whether money laundering can be presumed without proving knowledge of proceeds of crime, leading to a discussion on the legal definition and implications of acquittals in money laundering cases.

    The Glaring Illegality Of Ban Orders Against Asianet News & Media One TV

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Indian government's ban on Asianet News and Media One TV for their reporting on the Delhi riots is legally flawed due to vague reasoning and disproportionate penalties.

    Supreme Court Dismisses Amnesty International's Challenge Against ED Freezing Bank Accounts As Provisional Attachment Order Was Passed In Meantime

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court dismissed Amnesty International India's challenge to the Enforcement Directorate's freezing of its bank accounts, deferring the challenge to the provisional attachment order.

    Civil Judges' Recruitment : Gujarat & Karnataka HCs Suspend Selection Process To Await Supreme Court Judgment On Minimum Practice Condition

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Gujarat and Karnataka High Courts have suspended the recruitment process for Civil Judges, awaiting the Supreme Court's decision on the minimum practice requirement for applicants.

    ‘Mijn vrienden en ik hebben al zo vaak dronken seks gehad. Kunnen we dan allemaal vervolgd worden?’: studenten over het begrip ‘toestemming’ | Humo: The Wild Site

    humo.be Law Belgium

    A Belgian article discusses the complexities of consent and sexual assault among students, particularly when alcohol is involved, sparked by a controversial court case.

    Sulla competenza della Sezione specializzata in materia di imprese in materia di fideiussione su modello ABI | Giurisprudenza delle imprese

    giurisprudenzadelleimprese.it Law Italy

    A court ruling clarifies the jurisdiction over challenges to surety bonds based on antitrust violations, determining that such objections are part of the opposition to summary judgment proceedings rather than separate claims.

    The Feasibility Of A Police Officer Independently Obtaining The Specimen Signatures And Handwritings Of An Accused Person During The Stage Of Investigation

    livelaw.in Law India

    This legal article analyzes the legality of police obtaining specimen signatures and handwriting from accused persons during investigations in India, considering various laws, court precedents, and constitutional rights.

    The Supreme Court threatens to bring “don’t say gay” to every classroom in America, in Mahmoud v. Taylor | Vox

    vox.com Law World

    The Supreme Court is considering a case that could broadly restrict discussions of LGBTQ+ themes in schools nationwide, potentially mirroring Florida's controversial 'Don't Say Gay' law.

    Il est soupçonné d’avoir modifié la teneur en THC de ses produits : un gérant de plusieurs commerces de CBD interpellé dans le Gard - midilibre.fr

    midilibre.fr Law France

    A CBD shop owner in the Gard region of France was arrested and charged with selling products exceeding the legal THC limit, after customers reported adverse effects.

    Appeals Court Halts Judge Boasberg’s Contempt Order in Deportations Case | The Epoch Times

    theepochtimes.com Law United States

    An appeals court temporarily halted a contempt order against the Trump administration for not complying with a judge's order prohibiting deportations under the Alien Enemies Act.

    Judge in Abrego Garcia case says there’s no evidence Trump administration is following her orders | CNN Politics

    cnn.com Law World

    A federal judge criticizes the Trump administration's lack of action in returning a mistakenly deported man from a dangerous Salvadoran prison, ordering expedited discovery to determine compliance with her court orders.

    What could the For Women Scotland judgment mean for women’s rights? | The Spectator

    spectator.co.uk Law Scotland

    The UK Supreme Court is set to rule on the legal definition of 'woman' in relation to Scotland's Gender Representation on Public Boards Act 2018, a case brought by For Women Scotland.

    Boston Police Department under fire as it faces contempt threat

    bostonherald.com Law USA

    The Boston Police Department faces contempt charges for failing to provide records in an internal affairs investigation involving an officer implicated in a fatal high-speed chase and other misconduct allegations.

    Un juez ordena la devolución a sus padres de una bebé que fue retirada por el difícil pasado de la madre | España | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    A Spanish court ordered the return of a baby to her parents after social services removed her due to the mother's difficult past, highlighting concerns about due process and potential risks to the child's welfare.

    NHS Fife told to 'admit defeat' in Sandie Peggie tribunal

    thecourier.co.uk Law Scotland

    A landmark Supreme Court ruling on the definition of “woman” in the Equality Act 2010 is prompting calls for NHS Fife to concede defeat in a tribunal brought by a nurse who clashed with a transgender colleague.

    El Tribunal Supremo del Reino Unido limita la definición legal de mujer al sexo biológico | Sociedad | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law UK

    The UK Supreme Court ruled that the 2010 Equality Act's definition of 'woman' refers solely to biological sex, limiting legal protections for transgender women.

    State constable stopped for speeding charged with DUI in Woodward Township | News, Sports, Jobs - Williamsport Sun-Gazette

    sungazette.com Law Pennsylvania

    A Pennsylvania state constable was arrested for DUI and speeding after failing to stop for police, claiming he was en route to a sobriety checkpoint.

    Supreme Court immigration ruling: Due process in theory, deportation in practice - Los Angeles Times

    latimes.com Law World

    The Supreme Court's ruling on the Trump administration's use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport immigrants sparks debate, with both supporters and critics highlighting aspects of the decision.

    The Supreme Court considers tearing a new hole in the wall separating church and state | Vox

    vox.com Law USA

    The Supreme Court case, Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond, challenges the separation of church and state in public education by considering whether a religious public charter school can be established.

    UK Supreme Court Says Trans Women Are Not Legally Women Under Equality Act - The New York Times

    nytimes.com Law UK

    The UK Supreme Court ruled that the Equality Act's definition of 'woman' is based on biological sex, impacting transgender rights and single-sex services.

    American citizen Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez detained under ICE hold in Florida is released | CNN

    cnn.com Law USA

    A US-born citizen was wrongly detained by ICE in Florida under a recently blocked state law, highlighting concerns about racial profiling and immigrants' rights.

    Transgender rights ruling: UK’s highest court finds that a ‘woman’ is someone born biologically female

    smh.com.au Law UK

    The UK Supreme Court ruled that a ‘woman’ is someone born biologically female, sparking mixed reactions and raising concerns about the implications for transgender rights and single-sex services.

    Alud de demandas en los juzgados de Bilbao antes de la mediación obligatoria | El Correo

    elcorreo.com Law Spain

    A surge in lawsuits in Bilbao courts before mandatory mediation caused delays and concerns about the new law's implementation.

    Men Who Identify as Transgender Are Not Women, UK Supreme Court Rules | The Epoch Times

    theepochtimes.com Law UK

    The UK Supreme Court ruled that the legal definition of "woman" refers to biological sex, excluding transgender men with gender recognition certificates from certain single-sex spaces.

    Diddy Wants to Delay Sex-Trafficking Trial by Two Months

    vulture.com Law USA

    Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team is seeking a two-month postponement of his sex-trafficking trial in New York, citing the need for more time to prepare a defense following a recent superseding indictment.

    "Overt Discrimination Has Now Become Systemic; Casteist, Ableist, Genderist Hierarchies Entrenched Structures In Society": Justice DY Chandrachud

    livelaw.in Law India

    Justice D.Y. Chandrachud highlights the systemic nature of casteist, ableist, and gendered discrimination in India, emphasizing the need for inclusive representation beyond mere legal interventions.

    A Mother Can’t Be Compelled To Choose Between Her Motherhood & Employment, State Can’t Discriminate Against Her 'Right To Dignity' As Mother: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Kerala High Court ruled that a mother cannot be forced to choose between motherhood and employment, emphasizing the fundamental right to dignity as a mother and urging the state to enact legislation protecting employees from family responsibility-based discrimination.

    Women Face Intersectional Discrimination At Many Levels, Those Issues Must Be Addressed: Kerala HC On Model Law To Protect Women In Workplace

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Kerala High Court highlighted the need to address intersectional discrimination against women in a new workplace protection law, prompted by the Hema Committee Report's findings on the Malayalam film industry.

    Lawyers call for toll fine overhaul to stop people spiralling into huge debt

    theage.com.au Law Australia

    Lawyers in Victoria are calling for an overhaul of the toll fine system to prevent people from accumulating massive debts due to late fees and penalties.

    ​Law of the land: on the judiciary and waqf amendments - The Hindu

    thehindu.com Law India

    The Supreme Court of India is examining the constitutionality of amendments to the Waqf Act, 2025, which expand government control over waqf properties and raise concerns about religious freedom and the autonomy of the Muslim community.

    Forum Shopping Is Abuse Of Legal Process And Cannot Be Condoned: Delhi High Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition due to forum shopping, emphasizing that the dispute should be handled by the appropriate court in Tamil Nadu where the cause of action originated.

    Alito Chimes* at Midnight | The New York Sun

    nysun.com Law United States

    Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito dissents against a midnight order halting deportations, citing procedural irregularities and questioning the use of the All Writs Act.

    Luigi Mangione prosecutors' office did eavesdrop on jailhouse call: docs | Fox News

    foxnews.com Law USA

    Federal prosecutors admit to listening to a jailhouse call between murder suspect Luigi Mangione and his attorney, despite initial denials.

    1991 Places of Worship Act: What Supreme Court stopped, why | Explained News - The Indian Express

    indianexpress.com Law India

    The Indian Supreme Court temporarily halted all new legal challenges to the ownership of religious sites and surveys of disputed places, impacting numerous pending cases questioning the Places of Worship Act of 1991.

    Supreme Court Flags Long Submissions In S.34/37 Arbitration Act Proceedings, Says Timelimit Needs To Be Imposed

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India criticized excessively long submissions in arbitration proceedings under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, advocating for time limits to improve efficiency.

    Dundee man in court for calling parking warden 'Jackie Chan'

    thecourier.co.uk Law Scotland

    A Dundee man was fined for verbally abusing parking wardens, including a racist remark referencing Jackie Chan.

    Ill-informed challenges to Supreme Court decision help nobody

    thetimes.com Law UK

    The Supreme Court's ruling that 'woman' refers to biological sex in the Equality Act 2010 has sparked debate, with some criticisms based on misunderstandings of the decision.

    Mississippi Supreme Court Rules Transitioning Teen Not Entitled to Name Change | The Epoch Times

    theepochtimes.com Law Mississippi

    The Mississippi Supreme Court ruled that a minor undergoing gender transition cannot legally change their name to a masculine one, citing state law requiring name changes to be 'clearly in the best interest of the child'.

    Una empleada de hogar aprovecha una baja para trabajar en secreto en otra vivienda... y la Justicia le da la razón

    elconfidencial.com Law Spain

    A Spanish court ruled in favor of a domestic worker who was fired after being caught working elsewhere while on sick leave, highlighting a legal dispute over proper notification of dismissal.

    Supreme Court Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett are likely to rescue Obamacare, in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management | Vox

    vox.com Law World

    The Supreme Court heard arguments in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, a case challenging the authority of the US Preventive Services Task Force to mandate preventative care coverage under the Affordable Care Act, with Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett seemingly leaning against dismantling the Task Force.

    US supreme court hears challenge to Obamacare free preventive healthcare | US supreme court | The Guardian

    theguardian.com Law US

    The US Supreme Court heard arguments on a case challenging the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act's free preventive healthcare services.

    Why this police interrogation crossed the line. A collapsed murder case puts Canadian police interview techniques under scrutiny

    thestar.com Law Canada

    A Canadian murder conviction is overturned due to a flawed police interrogation, prompting scrutiny of interview techniques and highlighting the risks of false confessions.

    Barristers disciplined over ‘offensive, demeaning’ LGBTQI ‘joke’ posted in lifts

    watoday.com.au Law Australia

    Two Australian barristers received reprimands and penalties for posting an offensive LGBTQI joke in their workplace, highlighting issues of professional conduct and inclusivity within the legal profession.

    Lawyers Running Individual Practice Exempt From Levy Of GST, Service Tax: Orissa High Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Orissa High Court ruled that individual practicing lawyers are exempt from GST and service tax levies, quashing notices issued to a lawyer demanding significant tax and penalties.

    Trump-appointed judge says president’s use of Alien Enemies Act is unlawful in first-of-its-kind ruling | CNN Politics

    cnn.com Law World

    A Texas federal judge, appointed by Donald Trump, ruled the President's use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan gang members unlawful, marking the first such ruling.

    My neighbour's pointed a camera at my garden and is filming my every move... what can I do? DEAN DUNHAM replies | Daily Mail Online

    dailymail.co.uk Law UK

    A legal expert advises on dealing with a neighbor's CCTV camera pointed at one's garden, and on resolving an insurance claim denial due to faulty guttering.

    Guidance for 'sustainable' claims after dismissal of H&M 'greenwashing' class action | Reuters

    reuters.com Law World

    A federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit against H&M for its 'Conscious Choice' line, prompting discussion on the legal implications of 'sustainable' marketing claims and the need for clearer FTC guidelines.

    Garda whistleblower sues force over arrest by armed officers during football match with friends – The Irish Times

    irishtimes.com Law Ireland

    A former Irish police officer is suing the Garda Commissioner, alleging wrongful arrest and retaliation for whistleblowing on defective gun holsters.

    High Court fatwa ruling raises alarm over sharia courts in UK

    thetimes.com Law UK

    A High Court ruling in the UK that incorporated a sharia council's fatwa into a case has sparked concerns among secular campaigners about the influence of religious law in the country's legal system.

    С мая Роскомнадзор начнет брать миллионные штрафы. Как убедиться, что вашей компании они не грозят – Главбух № 7, Апрель 2025

    e.glavbukh.ru Law Russia

    Starting in May, Russia's Roskomnadzor will impose substantial fines for mishandling personal data, with the maximum reaching 500 million rubles, prompting businesses to bolster their data security measures.

    I quit as a subcontractor and was told not to contact clients or colleagues. Is this legal? - The Globe and Mail

    theglobeandmail.com Law Canada

    A former subcontractor seeks legal advice after their former employer prohibits them from contacting clients, colleagues, or speaking negatively about the company.

    The Supreme Court could force Oklahoma to establish and fund a Catholic charter school.

    slate.com Law United States

    The Supreme Court is considering whether Oklahoma must fund a Catholic charter school, potentially overturning established precedents on state funding of religious institutions.

    El juez que investiga al fiscal general cita como testigo a la pareja de Ayuso el 23 de mayo | España | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    A Spanish judge investigating the Attorney General has subpoenaed Isabel Díaz Ayuso's partner as a witness in a case involving alleged leaks of confidential information.

    Caso New Business: Valentín Martínez fue absuelto gracias a la ayuda de Riccardo Francolini | La Prensa Panamá

    prensa.com Law Panama

    Valentín Martínez, initially convicted of money laundering in the New Business case, was acquitted after a new sworn statement from Riccardo Francolini shifted blame.

    Jovem Pan vai pagar R$ 40 mil a Ian Neves por ofensa - 21/03/2025 - Outro Canal - F5

    f5.folha.uol.com.br Law Brazil

    A Brazilian court ordered Jovem Pan to pay R$ 40,000 in moral damages to historian Ian Neves for defamatory statements made by commentator Tiago Pavinatto.

    Michael Anthony Lunn: Vaucluse students vindicated as teacher found to be paedophile

    smh.com.au Law Australia

    A former teacher, Michael Anthony Lunn, was found guilty of multiple counts of child sexual assault, vindicating past and present victims who bravely came forward.

    ‘That ends now’: Judge overseeing Abrego Garcia case knocks Trump administration for repeated stonewalling | CNN Politics

    cnn.com Law World

    A federal judge criticizes the Trump administration for obstructing the expedited return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia from El Salvador after his wrongful deportation.

    Twelve states sue the Trump administration over ‘tax hikes’ through tariffs | CNN Business

    cnn.com Law United States

    Twelve states are suing the Trump administration, alleging that tariffs imposed via the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) illegally raise taxes on Americans.

    La UCO concluye que no hay información “de interés” en los datos enviados por Google y WhatsApp sobre el fiscal general | España | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    A Spanish Supreme Court judge's attempt to retrieve data from the Attorney General's phone yielded no incriminating evidence, according to a Guardia Civil report.

    CNN Settles Defamation Suit After Being Ordered to Pay $5 Million - The New York Times

    nytimes.com Law World

    CNN settled a defamation lawsuit after a Florida jury ordered the network to pay $5 million to a security contractor for false accusations made in a 2021 news segment.

    Burden Of Proof Lies With Complainant In Consumer Cases: Ernakulam District Commission

    livelaw.in Law India

    An Indian consumer court ruled that the burden of proof in consumer cases rests with the complainant, dismissing a case due to insufficient evidence.

    Should Grounds Of Arrest Be Mandatorily Supplied 'Prior' To Arrest In Every Case? Supreme Court Reserves Orders In Worli Hit & Run Case

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India reserved its judgment on whether providing written grounds for arrest is mandatory before or immediately after arrest in all cases, stemming from a hit-and-run case.

    Hijo de Luis Hermosilla: “Siempre ha sido un gallo súper valiente y bueno para ir contra la corriente” - La Tercera

    latercera.com Law Chile

    A forensic social report commissioned by the defense of Luis Hermosilla, who is accused of tax crimes, bribery, and money laundering, reveals details about his family's life and their support during his legal battle.

    Quasi-Judicial Authority Can’t Pass Non-Speaking Orders: Rajasthan HC Sets Aside Punishment Imposed On Constable Allegedly Found Intoxicated On Duty

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Rajasthan High Court overturned the punishment of a constable found allegedly intoxicated on duty, citing the disciplinary authority's failure to provide sufficient reasoning in their decision.

    Primeras condenas a bares de Bilbao por poner la televisión sin pagar derechos | El Correo

    elcorreo.com Law Spain

    Several Bilbao bars have been ordered to pay for broadcasting television content without proper authorizations, leading to a legal battle between the bars and AISGE, an association of actors and interpreters.

    Neue Gesetze im Aargau: Das ändert sich am 1.Januar 2025

    aargauerzeitung.ch Law Switzerland

    New laws in Aargau, Switzerland, effective January 1, 2025, include tax cuts, increased child allowances, and changes to disability support.

    'In India, Every State Action Must Be Fair, Failing Which It Will Fall Foul Of Article 14' : Supreme Court Sets Aside Direction To Shift NH Toll Plaza

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India overturned a Patna High Court ruling that ordered the relocation of a toll plaza on National Highway 30, citing fairness and adherence to Article 14 of the Indian Constitution.

    What the Gorsuch-Sotomayor factual dispute in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District is about - The Washington Post

    washingtonpost.com Law USA

    The Supreme Court's decision in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District highlights a disagreement among justices regarding the factual accuracy of the majority opinion concerning a football coach's post-game prayers.

    Supreme Court analysis: The most complex, straightforward case of the term.

    slate.com Law World

    The Supreme Court case, Mahmoud v. Taylor, debates whether parents have a constitutional right to shield their children from LGBTQ+-inclusive books in schools, raising questions about religious freedom, parental rights, and the nature of public education.

    Judge Halts Order Demanding Details on Efforts to Return Abrego Garcia to US | The Epoch Times

    theepochtimes.com Law World

    A federal judge temporarily halted her order demanding details from the US government regarding the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador, despite a court order preventing his deportation.

    Justices Imply Narrow Fuel Maker Win in Auto Emissions Suit (1)

    news.bloomberglaw.com Law USA

    The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case concerning fuel producers' ability to challenge California's stringent auto emission regulations, focusing on whether the producers have standing to sue.

    "Se remettre dans le bain, cinq ans et demi après, risque d’être dur" : le chasseur auteur d’un tir mortel lors d’une battue en Ariège bientôt jugé - ladepeche.fr

    ladepeche.fr Law France

    Five and a half years after a fatal hunting accident in Ariège, France, the trial of those responsible is set to begin, bringing a long-awaited moment of potential closure for the victim's family.

    Conclusion: The Future Of Sale Certificate Registration Under SARFAESI

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India has definitively ruled on the registration exemption for sale certificates issued under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI).

    GST : No Detention Of Goods If There Is Bona Fide Dispute On Tax Rate, Holds Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Kerala High Court ruled that goods cannot be detained under the GST Act if a bona fide dispute exists regarding the tax rate.

    S.129 CGST/SGST Act | Penalty Only For Violations With Intent To Evade Tax Or Repeated Violations; Not For Minor Discrepancies : Kerala High Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Kerala High Court ruled that penalties under Section 129 of the CGST/SGST Act apply only to intentional tax evasion or repeated violations, not minor discrepancies.

    Fuerte tirón de orejas de la jueza de la dana a Pradas por desvelar la declaración de Bernabé | Las Provincias

    lasprovincias.es Law Spain

    A Spanish judge rebukes a former government official for publicly disclosing details of a witness's testimony in an ongoing investigation.

    Read the texts Karen Read and John O’Keefe exchanged before his tragic death

    bostonglobe.com Law USA

    Text messages exchanged between Karen Read and John O'Keefe before his death were presented in court, revealing a strained relationship marked by arguments and disagreements.

    Ben Roberts-Smith appeal dealt blow in Federal Court

    theage.com.au Law Australia

    Ben Roberts-Smith's appeal against a defamation judgment finding him guilty of war crimes in Afghanistan has been dealt a setback in the Federal Court.

    New Mexico Supreme Court Bans Former Judge From Exercising Judicial Authority | The Epoch Times

    theepochtimes.com Law New Mexico

    A New Mexico judge resigned after an alleged gang member was arrested at his home, leading the state Supreme Court to ban him from ever holding judicial office again.

    Former New Mexico Judge, Wife Arrested Over Alleged Evidence Tampering | The Epoch Times

    theepochtimes.com Law New Mexico

    A former New Mexico judge and his wife were arrested on evidence tampering charges after an alleged gang member was found living in their home.

    FBI director says Wisconsin judge arrested for allegedly obstructing ICE | CNN Politics

    cnn.com Law USA

    A Milwaukee County Circuit judge was arrested by the FBI for allegedly obstructing the arrest of an undocumented immigrant.

    Wisconsin judge arrested by FBI, charged with obstructing immigrant arrest - The Washington Post

    washingtonpost.com Law USA

    A Wisconsin judge was arrested and charged with obstructing an immigration arrest, escalating tensions between the Justice Department and local officials over immigration enforcement.

    FBI Arrests Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan Over Obstructing, Kash Patel Says | The Epoch Times

    theepochtimes.com Law USA

    FBI Director Kash Patel announced the arrest of Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan on obstruction charges for allegedly aiding an illegal immigrant's escape.

    Counsellor in ‘total fear’ of ex-client he entered ‘toxic’ relationship with, court hears – The Irish Times

    irishtimes.com Law Ireland

    An Irish counsellor obtained a domestic violence protection order against a former client after describing a toxic relationship and ongoing harassment.

    Legal Island | Deductions from Pay for Cash/Till Shortages

    legal-island.com Law Ireland

    This legal advice discusses whether employers can deduct money from employee wages for cash shortages, clarifying that such deductions are generally unlawful unless explicitly agreed upon in writing beforehand.

    The clever court ploy that could force Trump’s El Salvador scheme to a head.

    slate.com Law World

    The ACLU's strategic legal maneuver aims to force a decision on Trump's controversial plan to deport Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador.

    Landowner fails in legal bid against forced sale of St Andrews site

    thecourier.co.uk Law Scotland

    A Scottish court upheld a government decision to force the sale of a St Andrews land plot to a community group for a public garden, rejecting the landowner's claim of unlawful procedures.

    Karen Read retrial: Here's how Friday unfolded

    bostonglobe.com Law Massachusetts

    The Karen Read retrial continued with testimony from a paramedic and a hospital lab director, followed by a jury visit to the crime scene.

    My son was assaulted at work, yet he was fired. What are his rights?

    watoday.com.au Law Australia

    A son was unjustly fired after being assaulted at work, prompting questions about his legal rights and employer responsibilities under Australian law.

    Saif Ali Khan ‘Enemy Property’ Case Laws and Property Details Explained | Saif Ali Khan Pataudi House

    indianexpress.com Law India

    The Madhya Pradesh High Court directed Saif Ali Khan to appeal a government decision classifying his family's historical properties as "enemy property", prompting a discussion on Indian law regarding inheritance and assets left by those who migrated to enemy nations.

    El borrador de sentencia del Constitucional sobre la ‘ley trans’ avala su constitucionalidad | Sociedad | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    Spain's Constitutional Court is poised to largely uphold the country's transgender law, allowing individuals to change their registered gender based on self-identification, despite some internal dissent.

    Interpretation of Tax Statutes | Explained

    legalbites.in Law India

    This article examines the interpretation of tax statutes in India, focusing on principles of strict construction, substantial compliance, and the application of these principles in various court cases.

    Restrictive and Beneficial Construction of Penal Statutes

    legalbites.in Law India

    This article examines the contrasting approaches of restrictive and beneficial construction in interpreting penal statutes, highlighting their application in Indian and comparative jurisprudence.

    Expiry and Repeal of Statutes: Introduction and Meaning

    legalbites.in Law India

    This article examines the legal mechanisms of expiry and repeal of statutes, focusing on their meaning, types, implications, and the Indian legal framework governing them.

    Supreme Court upholds inclusive digital access as a part of fundamental right to life - The Hindu

    thehindu.com Law India

    The Supreme Court of India ruled that inclusive digital access is a fundamental right, mandating the government to bridge the digital divide for marginalized communities.

    Class Action Settlement Administrators Sued Over Hidden Fees

    news.bloomberglaw.com Law United States

    Three class-action settlement administrators face a federal lawsuit alleging millions of dollars in undisclosed fees for using digital payment methods to distribute settlement funds.

    Two men acquitted of prestige car raffle scam

    theage.com.au Law World

    Two men were acquitted of charges related to a rigged luxury car raffle scheme involving multiple high-value vehicles.

    S.67 NDPS Act Statements Inadmissible': Supreme Court Cancels Conviction of Medical Shop Owner

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India overturned the conviction of a medical shop owner under the NDPS Act due to insufficient evidence linking him to a narcotics transportation conspiracy.

    Can Appellate Courts Modify Arbitral Awards Under S.34/37 Arbitration Act? Supreme Court Constitution Bench Reserves Judgement

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India reserved its judgment on whether appellate courts can modify arbitral awards under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

    When Can Court Remand Arbitral Award To Tribunal Under S.34/37 Arbitration Act ? Supreme Court Explains

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India clarified the limited circumstances under which courts can remand arbitral awards back to tribunals under sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, emphasizing a cautious approach and proportionality.

    Federal Judge Says Trump’s Use of Alien Enemies Act Is Unlawful, Blocks Deportations | The Epoch Times

    theepochtimes.com Law United States

    A federal judge ruled that President Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan gang members is unlawful, blocking the deportations in southern Texas.

    Insolvency Law In Review – November 2020

    livelaw.in Law India

    This article summarizes significant rulings on insolvency law in India during November 2020, covering decisions from the Supreme Court, High Courts, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), and National Company Law Tribunals (NCLTs).

    The Evolving Landscape Of Construction Arbitration In India- Key Judicial Pronouncements - Arbitration & Dispute Resolution - India

    mondaq.com Law India

    This article analyzes key judicial pronouncements shaping the landscape of construction arbitration in India, highlighting recent cases impacting arbitrator appointments and the grounds for setting aside arbitration awards.

    The Great Indian Bustard and climate action verdict - The Hindu

    thehindu.com Law India

    The Supreme Court of India recognized a fundamental right to be free from climate change's adverse impacts, prompting analysis of its implications for inclusive climate action and the protection of the Great Indian Bustard.

    A moment for just transition litigation to take wing - The Hindu

    thehindu.com Law India

    The Supreme Court of India's recognition of a human right against climate change impacts necessitates a 'just transition' framework for equitable climate action, including the protection of non-human entities.

    Additional briefs filed in Peters habeas corpus case | Western Colorado | gjsentinel.com

    gjsentinel.com Law Colorado

    Legal briefs filed in the habeas corpus case of Tina Peters, former Mesa County Clerk, debate the appropriateness of a magistrate judge ruling on a motion to strike a Department of Justice statement.

    Familia Halcartegaray, dueña de Guante, escala disputa por marca Nike Air Zoom - La Tercera

    latercera.com Law Chile

    The Halcartegaray family, owner of the Guante brand, is appealing a court decision that allowed Nike to register the "Nike Air Zoom" trademark in Chile.

    Supreme Court analysis: South Carolina firing squad execution botched.

    slate.com Law United States

    A botched firing squad execution in South Carolina highlights the inherent flaws and inhumanity of all capital punishment methods.

    'Media Entitled To Discuss Publicly Available Book': Kerala High Court Quashes Defamation Case For Discussing Book On Mata Amritanandamayi

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Kerala High Court dismissed a defamation case against media outlets for discussing a publicly available book critical of Mata Amritanandamayi, upholding the media's right to comment on matters in the public domain.

    Gérard Depardieu found guilty of sexual assault | CNN

    cnn.com Law France

    French actor Gérard Depardieu was found guilty of sexually assaulting two women and received an 18-month suspended sentence.

    Supreme Court to Decide if GST Applies to Mining Royalties

    livelaw.in Law India

    India's Supreme Court will decide whether Goods and Services Tax (GST) or Service Tax applies to mining royalties, a decision impacting numerous pending legal cases.

    Highlights from Day 1 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial | CNN

    cnn.com Law USA

    Day one of Sean "Diddy" Combs' racketeering and sex trafficking trial in New York City focused on allegations of coercion and consent, with key testimony from accusers and witnesses.

    Charges against pair accused of identifying boys in Kriégel case dismissed – The Irish Times

    irishtimes.com Law Ireland

    A Dublin court dismissed charges against two individuals accused of identifying the teenage boys convicted in the Ana Kriégel murder case, citing a breach of the Children Act.

    Il caso della notifica inesistente nonostante la costituzione del destinatario dell’atto | IUS PROCESSO CIVILE

    ius-giuffrefl-it.bibliopass.unito.it Law Italy

    A case concerning the invalidity of an appeal due to improper notification, even with the respondent's subsequent appearance, is analyzed by the Italian Supreme Court.

    From Paul Weiss to DLA Piper, 5 Lawyers Share How They Use AI at Work - Business Insider

    businessinsider.com Law World

    Five lawyers from various firms share how they use AI tools to improve efficiency and accuracy in their legal work, highlighting the growing adoption of AI in the legal profession while emphasizing the importance of human oversight.

    Justice Barrett Sits One Out | The New York Sun

    nysun.com Law United States

    Justice Amy Coney Barrett's recusal from a landmark religious liberty case raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and sets a concerning precedent.

    Attorney wants judge disqualified, in part because of affair rumors | Local Nevada | Local

    reviewjournal.com Law Nevada

    A Nevada public defender is seeking to disqualify a judge from all cases due to alleged antagonism, baseless accusations, and refusal to explain rulings.

    Nevada’s Judicial Discipline Commission censures Erika Ballou | Courts | Crime

    reviewjournal.com Law Nevada

    Nevada Judge Erika Ballou received a public censure for inappropriate social media posts and statements during a sentencing hearing, prompting a renewed motion for her recusal from cases involving the Clark County district attorney's office.

    Judge Erika Ballou accused of violating Nevada code of conduct | Courts | Crime

    reviewjournal.com Law Nevada

    Nevada District Court Judge Erika Ballou faces six counts of judicial misconduct for actions related to a criminal case and prior social media posts.

    KENNEDY reveals the heartbreaking truth of what Diddy's daughters REALLY saw in court... and why they may never recover | Daily Mail Online

    dailymail.co.uk Law World

    The article details the ongoing trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs, focusing on the testimony of his ex-girlfriend and the presence of his children in the courtroom.

    Just One Cookie? Justices to Decide Liability for Half-Truths

    law.com Law United States

    The Supreme Court will decide if partially true but misleading statements constitute 'false statements' under 18 U.S.C. § 1014, impacting prosecutions of white-collar crime.

    Alleged mushroom murders trial: husband denies asking Erin Patterson ‘is that what you used to poison them?’ | Victoria | The Guardian

    theguardian.com Law Australia

    The estranged husband of Erin Patterson, accused of murdering three people and attempting to murder another with poisoned mushrooms, denies asking her if she used mushrooms to poison them.

    Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial, Cassie Ventura testimony continues | CNN

    cnn.com Law World

    Cassie Ventura's testimony in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' trial reveals details about their relationship, including their substance use and Combs' alleged addiction.

    Rechazan recurso de amparo de inmobiliaria con edificio fantasma en Estación Central: privado sugiere su “condena de muerte” | Diario Financiero

    df.cl Law Chile

    A Chilean real estate company's legal challenge against the municipality and regional government over the delayed approval of a building project has been rejected by the Court of Appeals, leading to an appeal to the Supreme Court.

    Fundamental duties - iPleaders

    blog.ipleaders.in Law India

    This article comprehensively explores the fundamental duties enshrined in the Indian Constitution, tracing their origin, scope, and significance in legal interpretations.

    Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala : case analysis

    blog.ipleaders.in Law India

    This article analyzes the landmark Indian Supreme Court case, Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala, focusing on the conflict between the fundamental right to freedom of religion and the duty to respect the National Anthem.

    Supreme Court Wrestles With Nationwide Injunctions in Birthright Citizenship Case | The Epoch Times

    theepochtimes.com Law World

    The Supreme Court heard arguments on the legality of nationwide injunctions used to block President Trump's birthright citizenship order, focusing less on the policy itself and more on the scope of judicial authority.

    Jury selection set to begin in Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs federal trial | CNN

    cnn.com Law USA

    Jury selection is underway in the federal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, who faces serious charges including racketeering and sex trafficking, with opening statements expected to begin on May 12th.

    Ben Roberts-Smith appeal: The $1.5 million legal application dismissed in seven words

    smh.com.au Law Australia

    The Federal Court of Australia unanimously dismissed Ben Roberts-Smith's $1.5 million appeal, upholding the original defamation ruling against him and leaving him to contemplate further legal action.

    California’s White-Collar Exemption Requirements: Compliance Tips

    shrm.org Law California

    California employers must navigate complex state and federal regulations to ensure compliance with white-collar exemption requirements for overtime pay, particularly concerning salary thresholds and duties tests.

    Lawyers turn to Facebook to celebrate mistrial; DA unfriends them

    ajc.com Law Georgia

    A mistrial in a Cobb County double-murder case sparks a legal dispute between defense lawyers and prosecutors, fueled by Facebook posts and accusations of gender bias.

    Osječka sutkinja postupala je slično uhićenom sucu Živiću | Telegram.hr

    telegram.hr Law Croatia

    A Croatian judge, Jadranka Seletković, faces a disciplinary procedure due to numerous procedural irregularities and possible falsifications of court documents, mirroring a similar case involving another judge.

    Yannick Agnel renvoyé aux assises pour viol : comment la version de l'ancien nageur a évolué au fil de l'enquête

    lequipe.fr Law France

    French swimmer Yannick Agnel's evolving statements regarding a sexual relationship with a minor led to his referral to the Assizes Court on charges of rape and sexual assault.

    Trump’s birthright citizenship arguments at Supreme Court are epically bad.

    slate.com Law United States

    The article analyzes the legal arguments surrounding Donald Trump's attempt to alter the 14th Amendment's birthright citizenship clause, highlighting the weak historical basis for his claims.

    Condenado a dos años y medio de cárcel por tuitear mensajes machistas | Política | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    A Spanish court sentenced a man to two and a half years in prison for posting misogynistic messages on Twitter, deemed as hate speech.

    Filtración audio Aemet día Dana Valencia | La Fiscalía de Valencia considera que hay delito en la filtración del audio de la conversación de Aemet con Emergencias | Las Provincias

    lasprovincias.es Law Spain

    A leaked audio recording of a conversation between Spanish meteorological agency Aemet and emergency services during a severe weather event is under investigation for potential criminal charges.

    Milwaukee judge faces 6 years in prison after federal indictment in ICE case | Fox News

    foxnews.com Law USA

    A Milwaukee judge faces six years in prison after being indicted for allegedly helping an undocumented immigrant evade immigration officers.

    Police chiefs call for 'stolen valour' offence to criminalise false medals

    telegraph.co.uk Law World

    Police chiefs advocate for a new 'stolen valour' offense to criminalize the fraudulent use of military medals, citing a recent case involving false claims of military service.

    Severance Plans

    shrm.org Law World

    This article provides an overview of severance pay, including legal obligations, ERISA compliance, and practical considerations for employers and employees.

    Was First Amendment Violated in Student Arrests? Trump Lawyer Won’t Say - The New York Times

    nytimes.com Law USA

    A US appeals court hearing raises questions about whether the First Amendment rights of two international students facing deportation for expressing views critical of Israel's actions in Gaza were violated.

    ‘Elite status’ woman not obliged to pay rent, RTB hearing told – The Irish Times

    irishtimes.com Law Ireland

    An Irish tenant's claim of 'elite status' to avoid rent payments was rejected by a Residential Tenancies Board tribunal, resulting in a significant arrears order.

    A federal court is about to decide whether to strike down Trump’s tariffs, in V.O.S. Selections v. Trump | Vox

    vox.com Law World

    A federal court is set to rule on the legality of Trump's tariffs, a decision with significant implications for the US economy and trade policy.

    Whether Law Of Limitation Applies To The DV Act?

    livelaw.in Law India

    This article analyzes the applicability of the law of limitation to proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, examining relevant case laws and the recent Supreme Court ruling in Kamatchi vs. Laxmi Narayan.

    I applied factor 50 sun cream but still got badly burnt - can I get compensation? Consumer lawyer DEAN DUNHAM replies | Daily Mail Online

    dailymail.co.uk Law World

    A consumer lawyer discusses whether individuals can seek compensation for sunburn despite using high-SPF sunscreen, and addresses another reader's issue with lost dry cleaning tickets.

    President Murmu asks Supreme Court whether timelines can be ‘imposed’ on President, Governors to clear State Bills - The Hindu

    thehindu.com Law India

    President Murmu has referred fourteen questions to the Supreme Court regarding the timelines for presidential and gubernatorial assent to state bills, seeking clarification on the court's powers to impose such timelines.

    Interior ordena a la Policía que no denuncie el consumo o tenencia de drogas dentro de coches aparcados | España | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    Spain's Ministry of Interior has instructed police not to report drug use or possession in parked cars unless related to trafficking, citing privacy concerns and Supreme Court jurisprudence.

    Ecco le principali modifiche legislative per introdurre i tempi parziali in magistratura | laRegione.ch

    laregione.ch Law Switzerland

    The Ticino canton in Switzerland is considering legislative changes to allow part-time employment for judges, aiming to improve work-life balance and broaden access to the judiciary.

    Stopp für „Dickpics“ - Österreich will sie strafbar machen - wie sieht es in Deutschland aus?

    chiemgau24.de Law Europe

    Austria is considering a law to criminalize the unsolicited sending of penis pictures, while Germany already has legal provisions addressing similar acts under existing laws.

    Garda faces trial after Brazilian delivery driver’s leg severed at M50 – The Irish Times

    irishtimes.com Law Ireland

    A Garda in Dublin faces trial for dangerous driving causing serious injury to a Brazilian delivery driver whose leg was severed in a 2023 incident on the M50.

    Novas ações trabalhistas na Justiça ultrapassam 2 milhões em 2024, maior aumento desde a reforma - Estadão

    estadao.com.br Law Brazil

    In 2024, Brazil saw a record high of over 2 million new labor lawsuits, exceeding the pre-2017 labor reform levels, primarily due to increased access to free legal aid and differing interpretations of the reform.

    Revinculación forzada: cuando la justicia insiste en un vínculo que ya no existe - La Tercera

    latercera.com Law Chile

    This article discusses the case of Martina, a child who is being forced into contact with an abusive father despite clear evidence of harm and her own strong objections, highlighting flaws in the Chilean legal system's handling of such cases.

    Condemnat un pare per agredir un home que havia tocat el seu fill en una piscina de Lleida

    elperiodico.cat Law Spain

    A father in Lleida, Spain, was fined and ordered to pay compensation for assaulting a man who had touched his son at a swimming pool.

    Supreme Court Issues Contempt Notice To Chief Secretaries Of Delhi, UP, Haryana, Rajasthan Over Non- Filling Of PCB Vacancies

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India issued contempt notices to the Chief Secretaries of Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, and Rajasthan for failing to fill vacancies in their respective Pollution Control Boards.

    No body no crime? How Mumbai court awarded life sentence to ex cop, absent victim’s body | Explained News - The Indian Express

    indianexpress.com Law India

    A Mumbai court sentenced a former police inspector to life imprisonment for murder despite the victim's body never being found, relying on circumstantial evidence and legal precedent.

    Una familia de Aragón logra la mayor indemnización por un accidente con 3,7 millones de euros porque los niños no son responsables de cruzar mal | España | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    A family in Aragon, Spain, received a record-breaking €3.7 million in compensation for a traffic accident involving their seven-year-old son, who was not held responsible due to his age.

    First Indian lawyer to get Medal of Honor

    thehansindia.com Law India

    Bhuwan Ribhu, founder of Just Rights for Children, became the first Indian lawyer to receive the World Jurist Association's Medal of Honor for his extensive work in child rights advocacy.

    Pharmacy Act | Allahabad High Court On The Right To Issue Non Objection Certificates to Pharmacy Colleges Vests With Pharmacy Council of India

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Allahabad High Court ruled that only the Pharmacy Council of India can revoke No Objection Certificates for pharmacy colleges, not state governments or boards, citing the Pharmacy Act's precedence and violation of natural justice principles.

    Exclusive | New York Law Firm That Struck Deal With Trump Is Losing Lawyers - WSJ

    wsj.com Law USA

    Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft's deal with President Trump to avoid a punitive executive order is backfiring, causing an exodus of lawyers.

    Sean “Diddy” Combs a la corte: las claves del juicio contra la estrella (y los famosos que podrían ser citados) - La Tercera

    latercera.com Law USA

    Sean "Diddy" Combs is facing trial on charges including extortion and sex trafficking, with potential celebrity witnesses and a key video evidence.

    'Tour de La Manada': no se ha hecho justicia, se ha restituido la cordura

    blogs.elconfidencial.com Law Spain

    The Spanish Constitutional Court unanimously overturned the conviction of Anónimo García, who was wrongly accused of creating a satirical 'Tour de La Manada' website.

    He was killed in a road rage incident. His family used AI to bring him to the courtroom to address his killer | CNN Business

    edition.cnn.com Law World

    A family used AI to create a video of their brother, killed in a road rage incident, to deliver his victim impact statement in court, prompting discussions about the ethical implications of using AI in legal settings.

    The Supreme Court will soon decide whether to weaken the judges holding back Trump | Vox

    vox.com Law World

    The Supreme Court will decide whether to limit nationwide injunctions, using a case challenging Trump's unconstitutional attempt to revoke birthright citizenship as a test case.

    What Diddy's overheard courtroom whispers to heavily pregnant TV reporter reveal | Daily Mail Online

    dailymail.co.uk Law USA

    Diddy's sex trafficking trial is underway, with key witness Cassie Ventura's pregnancy and the rapper's courtroom interactions creating significant attention.

    Gerry Adams defamation trial: laughs from the jury, a judge’s intervention and a ‘very fine story’ about a hedgehog – The Irish Times

    irishtimes.com Law Ireland

    Gerry Adams's defamation trial against the BBC, stemming from a 2016 Spotlight program alleging his involvement in a murder, is underway, featuring testimony, cross-examination, and unexpected moments of levity.

    Federal Appeals Court Upholds Gun Ban for Non-Violent Felons | The Epoch Times

    theepochtimes.com Law United States

    A federal appeals court upheld a law barring non-violent felons from owning guns, citing historical precedent for disarming those deemed dangerous.

    Law firm partner accused of rape at Sydney home loses $3 million lawsuit

    smh.com.au Law Australia

    A Sydney law firm partner lost a $3 million lawsuit after being accused of rape, with the judge finding sufficient evidence to warrant prosecution despite some inconclusive evidence.

    Suprema Corte de Justicia falló a favor de UBER en reclamo de conductor por supuesta relación de dependencia - EL PAÍS Uruguay

    elpais.com.uy Law Uruguay

    Uruguay's Supreme Court ruled in favor of Uber in a landmark case concerning a driver's claim of employment dependency, setting a precedent for future similar disputes.

    What is habeas corpus, the legal procedure Trump is considering suspending? | CNN Politics

    cnn.com Law United States

    President Trump's consideration of suspending habeas corpus, a fundamental legal right, has sparked debate about its implications for immigration and civil liberties.

    UK Woman Headed to Prison for Killing Man Who Was Sexually Assaulting Her – Twitchy

    twitchy.com Law UK

    A UK woman's appeal against a 17-year prison sentence for killing her rapist was denied, sparking debate about self-defense laws and the justice system.

    Restatements of the Law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org Law United States

    The Restatements of the Law, published by the American Law Institute, are influential compilations of case law aiming to clarify and guide judges and lawyers on common law principles.

    PETER HITCHENS: I've discovered ANOTHER secret police briefing took place during Lucy Letby trial. Here's what was revealed when I asked 8 key questions about what happened there | Daily Mail Online

    dailymail.co.uk Law England

    Concerns are raised about the fairness of Lucy Letby's trial due to two secret police press conferences held during its proceedings, prompting questions about potential bias and influence on media coverage.

    Retired police officer arrested over ‘thought crime’ tweet

    telegraph.co.uk Law UK

    A retired police officer was arrested and cautioned for a tweet that was misinterpreted as antisemitic, highlighting concerns about overzealous policing and the impact on his life.

    Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial; Cassie Ventura testimony continues | CNN

    cnn.com Law World

    Cassie Ventura's testimony continues in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial, with a legal request to avoid her appearance impacting the jury.

    Le secret en matière fiscale - Jennyfer Pilotin

    editions-harmattan.fr Law France

    This book explores the concept of fiscal secrecy, its evolution, and its legal framework in France, analyzing its implications for both taxpayers and tax authorities.

    Pirateria, ecco le multe. Identificati e sanzionati oltre 2.000 utenti in 80 province italiane | DDay.it

    dday.it Law Italy

    Over 2,000 users across 80 Italian provinces were identified and fined for illegally accessing IPTV services, resulting in significant administrative penalties.

    Unregistered Agreement To Sell Admissible As Evidence To Prove Contract In Specific Performance Suit : Supreme Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India ruled that an unregistered agreement to sell can be used as evidence in a specific performance lawsuit, citing a proviso in the Registration Act of 1908.

    German roots of 'Uber' help Australian company fend off trademark challenge | MLex | Specialist news and analysis on legal risk and regulation

    law360.com Law Australia

    An Australian tutoring company successfully defended its trademark 'Uber Tutors' against a challenge from Uber Technologies, citing the German meaning of 'Uber' in its defense.

    赵作海平反15年后去世 另一起鸣冤案仍在申诉|特稿精选_政经频道_财新网

    china.caixin.com Law China

    The recent death of Zhao Zuohai, 15 years after his wrongful conviction was overturned, highlights the ongoing struggle for justice in China, as another case, involving Yang Qianwei, awaits a similar resolution.

    Lawsuit Over Death in Crash of Sergey Brin's Plane Ends in Settlement - Business Insider

    businessinsider.com Law USA

    A lawsuit stemming from a fatal plane crash involving Google co-founder Sergey Brin's plane has concluded with a settlement, resolving claims of negligence.

    Supreme Court Grapples With Discrimination Lawsuit Against Labcorp | The Epoch Times

    theepochtimes.com Law World

    The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case challenging a class action lawsuit against Labcorp, questioning whether a class action can include plaintiffs who haven't suffered legal injuries.

    Una cuestión de escasa relevancia | Opinión | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    A Spanish judge's decision to proceed with a trial against the Attorney General and a provincial prosecutor for allegedly leaking information sparks debate over the legal implications of revealing partial conversations.

    Consumer Can Approach Consumer Forum Even If Agreement Provides For Arbitration : Supreme Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India ruled that consumers retain the right to approach consumer forums despite arbitration clauses in agreements, emphasizing consumer choice.

    Explained: The SC ruling that GST Council decisions are not binding on Centre or states | Explained News - The Indian Express

    indianexpress.com Law India

    The Supreme Court of India ruled that GST Council recommendations are not binding on the central or state governments, impacting India's federal structure and GST implementation.

    Justiça suspende exibição de vídeos de policiais no YouTube

    gazetadopovo.com.br Law Brazil

    A Brazilian court has temporarily suspended the display of 13 YouTube videos showing police officers discussing security operations due to concerns about human rights violations and potential hate speech.

    Marchena: "Es lógico que la 'reforma Bolaños' provoque suspicacia de intento de control ideológico de jueces y fiscales"

    elespanol.com Law Spain

    Judge Manuel Marchena critiques Spain's proposed judicial reforms, expressing concerns about potential ideological control and the need for institutional credibility.

    The Abrego Garcia Boomerang at the Supreme Court - WSJ

    wsj.com Law United States

    The Supreme Court debated the scope of injunctions against President Trump's birthright citizenship order, raising concerns about potential manipulation of the legal system.

    A&O Shearman har utviklet sitt eget AI-verktøy

    advokatwatch.no Law Norway

    Major Norwegian law firms are implementing AI tools, with A&O Shearman developing its own and others using solutions from external providers.

    The latest from the Aaron Thomas trial, R.I. basketball coach who conducted naked ‘fat tests’ of students

    bostonglobe.com Law Rhode Island

    The trial of Aaron Thomas, a former Rhode Island basketball coach accused of conducting naked "fat tests" on students, is ongoing, with the jury yet to reach a verdict.

    Who Ultimately Owns Content Generated By ChatGPT And Other AI Platforms?

    forbes.com Law World

    The article explores the complex legal questions surrounding copyright and ownership of content generated by AI platforms like ChatGPT, examining the roles of users, developers, and the potential for public domain status.

    El cuchillo, el sujetador, y un inadecuado test de ADN | Internacional | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Italy

    A flawed DNA analysis led to the acquittal of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito in the Meredith Kercher murder case, highlighting issues with the original investigation's procedures.

    How ‘12 Angry Men’ caused Harvey Weinstein mistrial

    telegraph.co.uk Law USA

    Juror misconduct and intense disagreements during deliberations led to a mistrial in Harvey Weinstein's case, raising concerns about the fairness and impartiality of the process.

    Boeing crash victims’ families say Justice Department set to drop criminal case, decry decision as ‘morally repugnant’ | CNN Business

    edition.cnn.com Law World

    The US Department of Justice is reportedly dropping criminal charges against Boeing over two fatal 737 Max crashes, prompting outrage from victims' families who decry the decision as morally repugnant.

    Court News for June 13, 2025 | Records | suncommercial.com

    suncommercial.com Law Indiana

    This article details recent filings in Clay County courts, including various felony and misdemeanor charges, as well as traffic citations and civil cases.

    Position of the ‘Shashoua Principle’ in the Indian Jurisprudence – RMLNLU Arbitration Law Blog

    rmlnluseal.home.blog Law India

    This article analyzes the Shashoua principle, a legal concept concerning the determination of the seat of arbitration, and its application within Indian jurisprudence, highlighting the ongoing debate and inconsistencies in its judicial interpretation.

    Modelo Ação de Deserdação

    modeloinicial.com.br Law Brazil

    This legal document outlines a disinheritance lawsuit in Brazil, detailing the grounds for the action, relevant legal articles, and the plaintiff's claims.

    Is Bribe-Giver Liable For Abetment Under S.12 Prevention Of Corruption Act Before 2018 Amendment? Supreme Court To Settle

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India will decide if offering a bribe, even without a demand, constitutes abetment under the Prevention of Corruption Act before its 2018 amendment.

    Karen Read retrial: Here's how Thursday unfolded

    bostonglobe.com Law Massachusetts

    This article recounts the events of a day in Karen Read's retrial, focusing on the cross-examination of a state police investigator and the presentation of evidence.

    Supreme Court: What it would look like if the Trump administration got its way in the birthright citizenship case.

    slate.com Law United States

    The Supreme Court's deliberation on Trump v. CASA will determine the fate of birthright citizenship for children born to undocumented immigrants in nearly half of US states, potentially creating a chaotic and fragmented system.

    Business of law: case studies

    ft.com Law World

    Several international law firms implemented innovative training programs and AI initiatives to enhance client relationships, boost staff performance, and improve business development.

    The Supreme Court just got an important police violence case right, in Barnes v. Felix | Vox

    vox.com Law USA

    The Supreme Court unanimously reversed a lower court's flawed approach to evaluating police use of force in the case of Barnes v. Felix, emphasizing the importance of considering the totality of circumstances.

    Dana en Valencia | El rifirrafe entre el abogado de Argüeso y la jueza de la dana termina con la expulsión de Manos Limpias | Las Provincias

    lasprovincias.es Law Spain

    A legal dispute in Valencia, Spain, between a judge and the lawyer for Emilio Argüeso led to the expulsion of Manos Limpias from the case due to perceived conflicts of interest.

    Hollywood's AI Lawsuit Sends a Warning to Tech Giants

    thewrap.com Law World

    Disney and Universal filed a lawsuit against Midjourney, alleging copyright infringement due to the AI art generator's unauthorized use of copyrighted material.

    Tracking the major Supreme Court cases of 2025 | CNN Politics

    cnn.com Law World

    The Supreme Court is issuing final opinions on significant cases, including birthright citizenship and transgender care, before its summer recess.

    Diddy's cunning courtroom tricks to win over the jury... and some say it's working | Daily Mail Online

    dailymail.co.uk Law USA

    Sean 'Diddy' Combs' trial for racketeering and sex trafficking is underway, and his defense team is employing various strategies, from wardrobe choices to courtroom props, to influence the jury.

    Borrado masivo de los datos de millones de autónomos de las bases de datos empresariales

    elconfidencial.com Law Spain

    Spanish data protection agency fines companies over a million euros for processing the personal data of self-employed individuals, ordering the mass deletion of their data from business databases.

    Cultural and Educational Rights: Articles 29-30 Under Indian Constitution

    blog.ipleaders.in Law India

    This article analyzes Articles 29 and 30 of the Indian Constitution, which address the cultural and educational rights of minority communities, exploring landmark cases and the government's role in upholding these rights.

    'Constitutional Challenge Can Be Addressed Before High Court': Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Provisions Of GST Act

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India dismissed a plea challenging the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, directing the petitioner to pursue the matter in the High Court.

    Pramati Educational & Cultural Trust vs. Union of India (2014)    - iPleaders

    blog.ipleaders.in Law India

    This article analyzes the Supreme Court of India's landmark 2014 judgment in Pramati Educational & Cultural Trust vs. Union of India, concerning the constitutionality of Articles 15(5) and 21A and the Right to Education Act.

    T.M.A. Pai Foundation & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. (2002) - iPleaders

    blog.ipleaders.in Law India

    This article provides a detailed analysis of the landmark Supreme Court case, T.M.A. Pai Foundation & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. (2002), focusing on minority educational institutions' rights in India.

    Latitude rape accused Alex Stokes gives evidence at trial | Lowestoft Journal

    lowestoftjournal.co.uk Law UK

    Alex Stokes, accused of rape at the Latitude Festival, testified in his defense at Ipswich Crown Court, presenting a conflicting account of events compared to the alleged victim's testimony.

    Le vigile d’une boîte de nuit frappe un jeune… qui est le fils d’un juge du tribunal judiciaire de Nîmes. - midilibre.fr

    midilibre.fr Law France

    A nightclub security guard in Nîmes, France, was sentenced to twelve months of probation after assaulting the son of a judge, leading to a trial that questioned the 21-day injury assessment.

    Intent Of S.11(6) Of Arbitration Act Is Not To Confer Jurisdiction On Courts Incompetent To Entertain Such Applications: Delhi High Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Delhi High Court ruled that Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, cannot grant jurisdiction to courts lacking the authority to hear such applications.

    Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial continues after Cassie Ventura’s testimony | CNN

    cnn.com Law USA

    Sean 'Diddy' Combs' trial continues with testimony focusing on RICO charges and allegations of coercion and abuse.

    Suspendieron el juicio por la muerte de Diego Maradona por 7 días - Infobae

    infobae.com Law Argentina

    The trial for Diego Maradona's death has been suspended for seven days due to an investigation into Judge Julieta Makintach for allegedly authorizing a documentary without consent from all parties.

    Arbitration Clause In The Original Agreement Would Not Survive When The Agreement Is Superseded By A Settlement Agreement Without An Arbitration Clause: Delhi High Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Delhi High Court ruled that an arbitration clause in an original agreement becomes void if a subsequent settlement agreement, lacking such a clause, supersedes the original contract.

    What Kiwis get wrong about wills, according to a family and divorce lawyer - NZ Herald

    nzherald.co.nz Law New Zealand

    Many New Zealanders lack wills, leading to legal complexities and increased costs for their families, highlighting the importance of straightforward will creation and regular updates.

    Инициирование банкротства должника: как определить его целесообразность в условиях нечетких данных – Корпоративный юрист № 11, Ноябрь 2020

    e.korpurist.ru Law Russia

    This article presents a methodology for quantitatively assessing the feasibility of initiating bankruptcy proceedings in Russia, using fuzzy-possibility models to incorporate expert knowledge and minimize risks under conditions of limited information.

    Arbitration Clause Prevails Over Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause, Court At Designated Seat Retains Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Delhi High Court ruled that an arbitration clause specifying a seat of arbitration prevails over an exclusive jurisdiction clause if the latter is expressly made subject to the former.

    Mordprozess im Fall Hanna W. aus Aschau: Landgericht Traunstein prüft Glaubwürdigkeit des Belastungszeugen

    chiemgau24.de Law Germany

    The Traunstein Regional Court is reviewing the credibility of a key witness in the Hanna W. murder trial, questioning the conviction of Sebastian T. before the retrial.

    Editorial: Massachusetts State Police guilty in Karen Read case

    bostonherald.com Law Massachusetts

    The Massachusetts State Police are criticized for their handling of the Karen Read murder investigation, with accusations of dereliction of duty, unprofessional conduct, and excessive overtime pay.

    South Korean woman, 29, enrolled in US high school because she was lonely, lawyer says | South China Morning Post

    scmp.com Law USA

    A 29-year-old South Korean woman facing charges for falsely enrolling in a US high school will participate in a pretrial intervention program after claiming loneliness motivated her actions.

    Ex-trooper’s motion to dismiss charges in fatal Rochester crash denied

    startribune.com Law Minnesota

    A Minnesota judge denied a former state trooper's motion to dismiss charges related to a fatal car crash that killed a teenager.

    Ben Roberts-Smith: OSI uncovers new war crimes evidence, secures fresh witnesses

    theage.com.au Law Australia

    New evidence and witness testimonies uncovered by the Office of Special Investigator (OSI) further implicate Ben Roberts-Smith in war crimes during his deployment in Afghanistan.

    Ben Roberts-Smith: OSI uncovers new war crimes evidence, secures fresh witnesses

    smh.com.au Law Australia

    New evidence and witnesses uncovered by the Office of Special Investigator (OSI) further implicate Ben Roberts-Smith in war crimes during his time in Afghanistan.

    Certificados falsos meédico Valencia | Absuelta una médica de falsear los certificados de vacunación de covid de cuatro pacientes | Las Provincias

    lasprovincias.es Law Spain

    A Spanish doctor was acquitted of forging COVID-19 vaccination certificates for four patients after a court ruled her actions, while dishonest, didn't constitute a criminal offense within her job duties.

    Víctimas de la dana piden a la jueza que aclare el auto donde lamenta los «bulos o situaciones imaginarias» | Las Provincias

    lasprovincias.es Law Spain

    Victims of the Dana flood in Spain are requesting clarification from a judge regarding her dismissal of certain claims as 'falsehoods or imaginary situations'.

    Right To Information, Checks And Balances, Public Private Partnership Model

    livelaw.in Law India

    This article examines the complex interplay between India's Right to Information Act and Public-Private Partnership projects, analyzing legal interpretations and disputes regarding access to information in such collaborations.

    J&K Govt Amends Judicial Recruitment Rules; New Syllabus Includes Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita & Other Reformed Laws

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Jammu and Kashmir government has significantly amended its judicial recruitment rules, updating the syllabus to include recently enacted criminal law codes and aligning the process with contemporary legal reforms.

    Unregistered Agreement Of Sale Can Be Used As An Evidence For Collateral Purpose: SC [Read Order]

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India ruled that an unregistered agreement of sale can be used as evidence for collateral purposes, overturning a High Court decision.

    Why experts fear Idaho murders suspect Bryan Kohberger's bombshell theory could see him walk FREE | Daily Mail Online

    dailymail.co.uk Law USA

    Bryan Kohberger's defense team is attempting a last-minute strategy to introduce an alternate suspect in the Idaho murders case, potentially impacting the trial outcome.

    Deadlocked Supreme Court Rejects Bid for Religious Charter School in Oklahoma - The New York Times

    nytimes.com Law USA

    The Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 on a case concerning the legality of using public funds to establish a religious charter school in Oklahoma, leaving a lower court's decision to block the school intact.

    Court's Observations In Interim Relief Applications Are Tentative & Temporary, Not Final Opinion On Merits Of Case: J&K High Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court clarified that a court's observations during interim relief applications are tentative and don't represent a final opinion on the case's merits.

    Litigators of the Week: A $406.8M Win for Regeneron in Antitrust Trial Showdown With Cholesterol Drug Rival Amgen

    law.com Law World

    A Delaware jury awarded Regeneron $406.8 million in its antitrust lawsuit against Amgen, alleging Amgen illegally bundled its cholesterol drug with others to exclude Regeneron's competitor.

    Jani Master, arrested on sexual assault charges, gets bail - The Hindu

    thehindu.com Law India

    Indian choreographer Jani Master, arrested on sexual assault charges, was granted bail by the Telangana High Court after a month in jail.

    'Ha copiato la tesi', Maria Rosaria Boccia accusata di truffa - Notizie - Ansa.it

    ansa.it Law Italy

    An Italian entrepreneur, Maria Rosaria Boccia, faces accusations of plagiarism and fraud after an investigation revealed her master's thesis was identical to one submitted previously by another student.

    Judge Halts Government’s Move to Bar International Students at Harvard - WSJ

    wsj.com Law USA

    A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order preventing the government from barring international students from attending Harvard University.

    The Supreme Court’s convoluted decision protecting the Federal Reserve from Trump, explained | Vox

    vox.com Law United States

    The Supreme Court's recent order temporarily prevents President Trump from firing Federal Reserve officials, despite a broader inclination towards expanding presidential authority over independent agencies.

    Dog breeder who caused £3.5k damage to Fife hotel admonished

    thecourier.co.uk Law Scotland

    A Scottish dog breeder was admonished by a court after causing £3,500 in damage to a hotel room and possessing illegal pepper spray.

    The Indian Water War: An International Law Perspective - Daily The Patriot

    dailythepatriot.com Law World

    The article analyzes the legal aspects of India's potential water blockage to Pakistan, emphasizing international law's mandate for equitable transboundary water sharing and the violation of human rights if access to water is denied.

    Joint liability under IPC - iPleaders

    blog.ipleaders.in Law India

    This article provides a detailed analysis of joint liability under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, explaining its scope, key elements, and landmark judgments.

    Difference between Sec 34 and 149 IPC, 1860

    blog.ipleaders.in Law India

    This article explains the differences between Section 34 and Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, focusing on the concepts of common intention and common object in joint criminal liability.

    Trump’s Cuts to N.I.H. Grants Are Illegal, Federal Judge Rules - The New York Times

    nytimes.com Law USA

    A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration's cuts to NIH grants were illegal, citing discrimination against minorities and LGBTQ individuals.

    Karen Read's retrial has new prosecution strategy: video evidence

    bostonglobe.com Law Massachusetts

    In Karen Read's retrial for the death of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, prosecutors are using video evidence of Read's past interviews to challenge her statements and counter the defense's claims of a police coverup.

    Descanso médico: Los documentos, recetas y boletas que debe presentar para que sea válido | ECONOMIA | GESTIÓN

    gestion.pe Law Peru

    This article details the necessary documentation and procedures for valid medical leave in Peru, clarifying employer and employee responsibilities regarding payment and EsSalud involvement.

    Man guilty of 'alarming people' by exposing himself at Fife house

    thecourier.co.uk Law Scotland

    A Fife man was found guilty of indecent exposure after two separate incidents where he was seen exposing himself at his front door, claiming he was urinating due to mobility issues.

    Supreme Court declines to hear appeal from seventh grader who wore ‘two genders’ shirt to school | CNN Politics

    cnn.com Law USA

    The Supreme Court refused to hear a case involving a middle school student who was asked to remove a shirt stating 'there are only two genders', prompting dissenting opinions from Justices Alito and Thomas.

    «Eso no lo hizo mi hijo, lo hizo su enfermedad, maldita su enfermedad», relata la madre del acusado | La Rioja

    larioja.com Law Spain

    The parents and sister of a man accused of fatally running over several people in Haro, Spain, testified in court that his actions stemmed from a severe schizophrenic episode.

    Court News for May 27, 2025 | Records | suncommercial.com

    suncommercial.com Law Indiana

    Clay County courts recently processed numerous cases, including felony DUI charges, misdemeanor drug and alcohol offenses, and various traffic citations.

    Un nuevo papelón de la Justicia argentina, esta vez, ante los ojos del mundo - LA NACION

    lanacion.com.ar Law Argentina

    A judge's participation in a docuseries about the Maradona death trial sparks outrage and highlights Argentina's history of controversial judicial processes.

    Is going to court worth it for personal injuries claimants? A lawyer and insurer go head to head on the issue – The Irish Times

    irishtimes.com Law Ireland

    A debate ensues regarding the efficacy of pursuing personal injury claims through court versus utilizing the Injuries Resolution Board (IRB), with contrasting viewpoints from an insurance executive and a barrister.

    Schleswig: Kinderpornografie-Prozess gegen Mann aus Angeln

    shz.de Law Germany

    A 43-year-old man in Schleswig, Germany, received a suspended sentence for possessing child pornography, highlighting the complexities of sentencing when intellectual disabilities are involved.

    The unbelievable photograph of two female megastars that's buried in Diddy evidence files | Daily Mail Online

    dailymail.co.uk Law USA

    A photograph of Rihanna and Serena Williams, found in evidence related to Sean 'Diddy' Combs' trial, is fueling debate surrounding allegations of sexual coercion and assault against him.

    Influencer evangélico acusado de estupros cita sexo consensual após absolvição: 'Meu erro foi espiritual. Não cometi crimes'

    oglobo.globo.com Law Brazil

    A Brazilian evangelical influencer, accused of raping three women, was acquitted, claiming the sexual encounters were consensual, despite facing imprisonment and significant personal repercussions.

    Harvard cede fotos de dois escravizados a museu de história negra após longa batalha judicial com descendente; entenda

    oglobo.globo.com Law USA

    After a six-year legal battle, Harvard University will relinquish ownership of daguerreotypes of an enslaved father and daughter to the International African American Museum in Charleston, South Carolina.

    Jessica Mann, Weinstein Accuser, Breaks Down in Tears at Trial - The New York Times

    nytimes.com Law USA

    Jessica Mann, a key witness in the Harvey Weinstein trial, emotionally broke down on the stand, revealing past sexual abuse and raising questions about the trial's trajectory.

    Suntracs y las fincas en Red Frog: la historia de un acuerdo que terminó en un proceso judicial | La Prensa Panamá

    prensa.com Law Panama

    A legal battle stemming from a real estate deal involving the Panamanian construction union Suntracs and workers from Red Frog Beach Club has led to arrests and a wider investigation.

    Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial continues after news of Cassie Ventura’s birth | CNN

    cnn.com Law World

    A former assistant's testimony in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex-trafficking trial details an alleged altercation between Combs and Cassie Ventura at a Prince party.

    Juez sobresee por prescripción a actor Cristián Campos, pero establece que abusos denunciados por hijastra sí existieron - La Tercera

    latercera.com Law Chile

    A Chilean judge dismissed a sexual abuse case against actor Cristián Campos due to the statute of limitations, but acknowledged that the abuse described by his stepdaughter did occur.

    A Texas Cop Searched License Plate Cameras Nationwide for a Woman Who Got an Abortion

    404media.co Law USA

    A Texas sheriff used a nationwide license plate reader network to locate a woman who self-administered an abortion, sparking concerns about privacy and cross-state legal jurisdiction.

    Diddy Trial Updates: Bombshell Court Moments, Prince's Party to Kid Cudi - Business Insider

    businessinsider.com Law USA

    Dawn Richard's testimony details alleged assault and threats by Sean Combs in 2009, prompting a heated response from Combs' defense attorney.

    Schaumburg man acquitted after child porn got mixed up in WWII downloads

    dailyherald.com Law USA

    A Schaumburg, Illinois man was acquitted of child pornography charges after a judge determined the images were unintentionally downloaded alongside World War II historical data.

    I reati contro gli animali diventano legge, multe e carcere per chi li abbandona - Notizie - Ansa.it

    ansa.it Law Italy

    Italy enacts stricter laws against animal abuse, including higher fines and prison sentences for abandonment and other forms of cruelty.

    Karen Read prosecution rests case on Day 23

    bostonherald.com Law Massachusetts

    The prosecution in the Karen Read murder retrial rested its case after 23 days of testimony, presenting evidence and witness accounts related to the death of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe.

    Periodistas de EL PAÍS ratifican ante el juez que conocieron el pacto que buscaba la pareja de Ayuso antes de que lo reclamara el fiscal general | España | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    EL PAÍS journalists testified in court about their prior knowledge of a proposed plea deal in a tax fraud case involving the partner of Madrid's regional president, before the information was given to the attorney general.

    GJPD officer denies wrongfully tasing man on ground | Western Colorado | gjsentinel.com

    gjsentinel.com Law Colorado

    A Grand Junction police officer denies using excessive force when tasing a man, leading to a lawsuit alleging unlawful seizure and excessive force.

    Judge tells attorneys bickering over O.J. Simpson estate to ‘knock it off’ | Local Las Vegas | Local

    reviewjournal.com Law Nevada

    A Las Vegas judge admonished attorneys embroiled in a contentious legal battle over O.J. Simpson's estate, urging them to settle their disputes and stop wasting the estate's funds.

    Landgericht Aurich: Steuerhinterziehung in Millionenhöhe in Leer – der Prozess steckt voller Überraschungen

    nwzonline.de Law Germany

    A trial in Aurich, Germany, reveals a complex tax evasion scheme involving a Chinese restaurant, with surprising testimony from the separated husband of the accused.

    Una ventana para legalizar pozos no inscritos | La Nación

    nacion.com Law Costa Rica

    Costa Rica offers a three-month amnesty for farmers to legalize unregistered water wells, aiming to balance agricultural needs with water conservation but requiring careful adherence to regulations.

    Judge to weigh detainment of Kilmar Abrego García in human smuggling case - The Washington Post

    washingtonpost.com Law United States

    A Maryland resident, wrongly deported to El Salvador, faces a court hearing to determine his pre-trial detention on human smuggling charges, highlighting a clash between the Trump administration's actions and court orders.

    EL JUEZ QUE SENTENCIÓ A MAJE Y SALVA, José María Gómez Villora: «Traté de evitar que la atención del juicio se desviara a la conducta sexual» de Maje | Las Provincias

    lasprovincias.es Law Spain

    Judge José María Gómez Villora reflects on the trial of Maje and Salva, highlighting the challenges, emotional toll, and the justice served in the case of Antonio Navarro's murder.

    La madre de todas las filtraciones | Público

    publico.es Law Spain

    A legal battle ensues in Spain over allegations of a data leak, involving the Attorney General and questioning the impartiality of the judicial process.

    Woollahra’s $10.6m failed sale offers a lesson in contract law

    smh.com.au Law Australia

    A failed $10.6 million property sale in Woollahra, Australia, highlights the complexities of contract law and the consequences of non-completion.

    Solicitors regulator sanctioned over £60m Beatties probe | Express & Star

    expressandstar.com Law UK

    A UK solicitors regulator faced sanctions after an independent review revealed serious concerns about its handling of a £60 million theft case involving the law firm Axiom Ince.

    The multimillion-dollar Coogee home and the family feud over John Angius’ $30 million estate

    smh.com.au Law Australia

    A legal battle ensues over the $30 million estate of John Angius, focusing on a family provision order awarded to his granddaughter and the role of his former lover.

    Sanctions: Employer held in contempt of underage/overtime consent order | Virginia Lawyers Weekly

    valawyersweekly.com Law Virginia

    A Virginia court held two companies and an individual in contempt for violating a consent order related to underage employment and wage violations, imposing sanctions to ensure compliance.

    More than 100 citations issued during month-long operation at Kehena Beach - West Hawaii Today

    westhawaiitoday.com Law Hawaii

    Over 100 citations were issued at Kehena Beach in Hawaii during a month-long law enforcement operation targeting violations such as alcohol consumption, drug use, and public nudity.

    „Ihr habt den Nikolaus genötigt“: Verkleideter Bad Endorfer landet vor Gericht

    chiemgau24.de Law Germany

    A man dressed as Saint Nicholas was brought to court in Germany after a traffic dispute involving two women, leading to accusations of harassment.

    Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Standard Chartered Bank Over Share Escrow Agreement Dispute

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India quashed a criminal case against Standard Chartered Bank and Starship Equity Holding Ltd, deeming the case a gross abuse of legal process stemming from a 2007 share escrow agreement dispute.

    Order 41 Rule 31 CPC | Appellate Court Not Bound To Frame Points Of Determination When Not Raised In Appeal : Supreme Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India clarified that an appellate court's omission to frame points of determination under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC doesn't invalidate its judgment if there's substantial compliance and the appellant didn't raise specific issues.

    Anulan por «inquisitorial» una sentencia contra una mujer del juez del 'caso Juana Rivas' | Ideal

    ideal.es Law Spain

    A Spanish court overturned a controversial five-year prison sentence against a mother for repeatedly reporting her ex-partner for child abuse, citing the judge's bias and inquisitorial conduct.

    Extremadura crea oficinas antiokupación, que estarán en funcionamiento en un mes | Hoy

    hoy.es Law Spain

    Extremadura is establishing free legal aid offices to assist victims of illegal housing occupations, providing immediate legal advice and guidance.

    Diddy trial: The bizarre difference between the courtroom and the YouTube streamers.

    slate.com Law World

    The Diddy trial in lower Manhattan highlights the growing influence of new media, particularly YouTubers and TikTokers, in covering major legal events.

    Explainer : Further Investigation, Re-investigation & Re-Trial

    livelaw.in Law India

    This article explains the legal distinctions between further investigation, reinvestigation, and retrial under Indian criminal procedure, highlighting relevant case laws and the powers of magistrates and courts.

    No Limitation Period For Execution Of Preliminary Decree For Partition: SC [Read Judgment]

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India ruled that there's no time limit for executing a preliminary decree for property partition, clarifying that the legal process continues until a final decree is issued.

    Cubatão luta na Justiça para manter área do Ecopátio avaliada em R$ 2,5 bilhões - Diário do Litoral

    diariodolitoral.com.br Law Brazil

    Cubatão, Brazil, is fighting a legal battle to retain control of the Ecopátio area, valued at R$2.5 billion, against a claim by the federal government.

    CVS employee arrested by Edgewater Officer Rippeon waiting for ride

    news-journalonline.com Law Florida

    A CVS employee in Edgewater, Florida, was wrongfully arrested by a police officer, leading to dropped charges and accusations of police misconduct.

    Maternità surrogata all’estero, ok all’adozione per i papà. “Vittoria nonostante reato universale” - la Repubblica

    repubblica.it Law Italy

    An Italian court ruled in favor of adoption for a same-sex couple's child born via surrogacy abroad, highlighting the child's right to a family despite the recent criminalization of surrogacy in Italy.

    School closed due to dispute over control of Islamic cultural centre in Dublin, court hears – The Irish Times

    irishtimes.com Law Ireland

    A legal dispute over control of the Islamic Cultural Centre in Dublin has led to the closure of the centre's school and mosque, prompting a High Court hearing.

    Judge: Federal prisons must continue providing hormone therapy

    nydailynews.com Law USA

    A federal judge ruled that the Bureau of Prisons must continue providing hormone therapy to transgender inmates, rejecting a Trump-era policy that disrupted their medical treatment.

    Decreto Sicurezza, reati e sanzioni: ecco come cambiano le norme su occupazioni, resistenza passiva e truffe agli anziani | Corriere.it

    roma.corriere.it Law Italy

    Italy's recently approved Security Decree introduces 14 new criminal offenses, harsher penalties for various crimes, and measures targeting issues such as illegal occupations, protests, and elder fraud.

    JB v. MB (170 N.J. 9,783 A.2d 707) - vLex United States

    case-law.vlex.com Law United States

    A New Jersey divorce case addresses the disposition of cryopreserved preembryos following the separation of a couple who underwent in vitro fertilization.

    “Hubo consumo de sustancias”: abogado de González intenta explicar actuar del médico en caso de Francisco Albornoz - La Tercera

    latercera.com Law Chile

    A lawyer defends a doctor accused in the death of a young man, arguing that the doctor's actions were taken while under the influence of substances and while attempting to help.

    Justiça condena Estado a indenizar torcedor vítima de tortura por policiais | GZH

    gauchazh.clicrbs.com.br Law Brazil

    A Brazilian court ordered the state of Rio Grande do Sul to pay over R$200,000 in compensation to a soccer fan who was tortured by police.

    The Supreme Court gets rid of a silly DEI rule pretty much no one liked | Vox

    vox.com Law World

    The Supreme Court unanimously struck down a discriminatory rule that placed a higher burden of proof on majority-group plaintiffs in workplace discrimination cases.

    Justiça vê ‘abordagem ilegal’ e absolve piloto flagrado com 435 quilos de cocaína em avião - Estadão

    estadao.com.br Law Brazil

    A Brazilian pilot arrested with 435 kilos of cocaine was acquitted due to the court deeming the police approach illegal, resulting in the nullification of all evidence.

    Las víctimas del cura Marcelino de los Legionarios, a sus madres: "Tengo monstruitos en la cabeza que no me dejan ser feliz"

    elespanol.com Law Spain

    Parents of victims testify in court about the sexual abuse committed by Father Marcelino, a priest from the Legionaries of Christ, at a Madrid school, detailing the children's traumatic experiences and the priest's threats.

    Gerry Adams defamation verdict won’t have a chilling effect on journalism - and here’s why – The Irish Times

    irishtimes.com Law Ireland

    The Irish Times article analyzes the defamation case verdict against the BBC, arguing that its implications for journalism are overstated and highlighting the BBC's internal issues.

    El Ayuntamiento comunica a los restaurantes de La Marina la anulación de la orden de cierre tras pedirlo los tribunales | Las Provincias

    lasprovincias.es Law Spain

    Valencia city council's order to close three restaurants in La Marina has been annulled by the courts, leading to ongoing legal battles and potential compensation claims.

    Sec 17 CPC - Suit In Respect Of Different Properties Can Be Filed In Any Of The Courts Having Jurisdiction If Cause Of Action Is The Same : SC [Read Judgment]

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India clarified the application of Section 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding suits involving multiple properties in different jurisdictions.

    A Relief For Which No Prayer Or Pleading Was Made Should Not Be Granted : Supreme Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India ruled that courts cannot grant relief not requested in the initial pleadings, highlighting the importance of due process and preventing miscarriages of justice.

    La Abogacía del Estado pide archivar la causa contra el fiscal general porque el pacto de la pareja de Ayuso no era secreto | España | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    Spain's State Attorney's Office has requested the Supreme Court to dismiss the case against the Attorney General, arguing that the leaked email's content was not confidential.

    Writ Of Certiorari Can Be Issued Even If Lis Is Between Two Private Parties: Calcutta High Court Reiterates

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Calcutta High Court issued a writ of certiorari against a private entity for violating a petitioner's right to a fair hearing, reiterating that such writs can be issued even in disputes between private parties.

    Suit Is Liable To Be Dismissed If A "Necessary Party" Is Not Impleaded : Supreme Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India dismissed a suit for specific performance due to the non-joinder of necessary parties, highlighting the requirement of including all parties whose rights are affected by the decree.

    Judge dismisses town lawsuits challenging key housing law

    bostonglobe.com Law Massachusetts

    A Massachusetts judge dismissed lawsuits from nine towns challenging a state housing law requiring increased multifamily housing near MBTA transit.

    Daspo dopo l'aggressione al carabiniere, studentessa bandita da tutti i bar. Ma il Tar annulla: «Per andare all'università deve passarci davanti»

    ilgazzettino.it Law Italy

    An Italian court overturned a ban on a student's access to bars after determining that it unreasonably interfered with her ability to attend university.

    Clottemans: "Speurders waren allemaal tegen mij" | De Morgen

    demorgen.be Law Belgium

    Els Clottemans accuses Tongeren investigators of biased interrogation tactics during the investigation of Els Van Doren's death, claiming they played games with her and disregarded alternative suspects.

    "Sabotage valscherm Van Doren in paraclub Zwartberg nagenoeg onmogelijk" | De Morgen

    demorgen.be Law Belgium

    A Belgian court visited the site of a parachute murder during the trial of Els Clottemans, assessing the feasibility of sabotage at the drop zone.

    'Land Can't Be Reserved Without Acquisition Indefinitely' : Supreme Court Declares Reservation Of Land Lapsed As Per S.127 MRTP Act

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India ruled that land reservations under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act lapse if not acquired within the prescribed timeframe, protecting landowners from indefinite restrictions.

    PoP Idols Shall Not Be Immersed In Any Natural Water Body: Bombay High Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Bombay High Court banned the immersion of Plaster of Paris idols in natural water bodies, citing environmental concerns and referencing a Central Pollution Control Board expert committee's recommendations.

    Psychiaters oneens over stoornis Els Clottemans | De Morgen

    demorgen.be Law Belgium

    A witness's testimony in the Els Clottemans trial unexpectedly shifts the narrative, raising questions about her actions during a fatal skydiving accident and prompting conflicting psychiatric evaluations.

    FBI allegedly probing former Spartanburg County SC deputy

    postandcourier.com Law South Carolina

    The FBI is reportedly investigating a former Spartanburg County deputy for potentially unlawful appointment and actions taken while serving.

    ¿Qué puede ocurrir ahora con Álvaro García Ortiz tras quedar al borde del banquillo? | España | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    A Spanish judge proposes to try the Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, for allegedly leaking sensitive information, leading to a potential trial at the Supreme Court.

    I Joined Every Class Action Lawsuit I Could Find, and So Can You | WIRED

    wired.com Law United States

    This article explores the author's experience participating in numerous class-action lawsuits and examines the history, current state, and future of class-action litigation in the United States.

    El Supremo confirma siete años de cárcel a un hombre que esclavizó sexualmente a una trabajadora del hogar

    eldiario.es Law Spain

    The Spanish Supreme Court upheld a seven-year prison sentence for a man who sexually abused his undocumented domestic worker in Madrid, highlighting the vulnerability of migrant workers to exploitation.

    García Ortiz: una causa criminal sin causa identificable | Opinión | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    A Spanish legal opinion criticizes the investigation and prosecution of a prosecutor, arguing that the case lacks sufficient evidence and justification.

    Claves del auto del fiscal general | El juez da credibilidad a la pareja de Ayuso y se la niega a los periodistas | España | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    A Spanish judge's ruling proposes to indict Spain's Attorney General and a Madrid prosecutor based on circumstantial evidence and disputed witness testimonies, raising questions about media credibility and potential political motivations.

    ‘Something going on in jury room’ at Harvey Weinstein trial, judge told

    telegraph.co.uk Law World

    Concerns arise in Harvey Weinstein's retrial as jurors report internal issues, prompting a closed-door meeting with the judge.

    ¿Tiene base la causa contra el fiscal general? ¿Debería dimitir? Siete juristas analizan el caso | España | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    Seven legal experts analyze the controversial case against Spain's Attorney General, debating the merits of the charges and whether he should resign.

    Abu Ousayd ‘dehumanised’ and ‘humiliated’ Jewish community, court hears

    smh.com.au Law Australia

    An Australian court case examines whether speeches by a religious leader constituted hate speech, with witnesses testifying to feelings of dehumanization and insecurity within the Jewish community.

    $65M punitive verdict is too big, says Georgia Court of Appeals

    ajc.com Law Georgia

    A Georgia appeals court reduced a $65 million punitive damage award in a fraud case, deeming it excessive despite upholding the underlying finding of fraud.

    Jurors in Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Trial Gasp as They’re Made to Watch Explicit Home Videos of Rap Mogul’s ‘Freak Off’ Sessions | The New York Sun

    nysun.com Law USA

    The Sean "Diddy" Combs sex trafficking trial took a dramatic turn as jurors viewed explicit videos of his "Freak Off" parties, further highlighting the accusations against the rap mogul.

    El grupo de rock Judas Priest, absuelto de incitar al suicidio | Cultura | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law World

    A Nevada judge ruled that Judas Priest is not responsible for the suicides of two young men who allegedly heard subliminal messages in their music.

    Can I legally drive with just a photo of my licence? - The Globe and Mail

    theglobeandmail.com Law Canada

    In Canada, a photo of your driver's license on your phone is insufficient; you must carry the physical license while driving, or face fines varying by province.

    400.000 Euro für „Wohnhaus“ am Inn bezahlt: Warum der Käufer es nicht nutzen darf!

    chiemgau24.de Law Germany

    A German man who purchased a riverside house for €400,000 is prohibited from renovating or inhabiting it due to legal restrictions on building in rural areas.

    Man found with extreme pornographic images spared jail | Daily Echo

    dailyecho.co.uk Law United Kingdom

    A 34-year-old man in Southampton avoided jail time after pleading guilty to possessing an extreme pornographic image, receiving a conditional discharge and a fine instead.

    Getty Images sues AI firm in landmark case for copyright law

    thetimes.com Law UK

    Getty Images is suing Stability AI in a landmark copyright case over the unauthorized use of millions of images to train its Stable Diffusion AI software.

    Tribunal condena a SEA por vulnerar derechos fundamentales de trabajadores que denunciaron “ambiente laboral tóxico” - La Tercera

    latercera.com Law Chile

    Two Chilean courts found the Environmental Assessment Service (SEA) liable for violating the fundamental rights of five employees who reported a toxic work environment, ordering the SEA to pay significant indemnities and issue public apologies.

    Bundesgericht: Polizei stürmt Wohnung von schwulem Paar, jetzt ist das Urteil da

    nzz.ch Law Switzerland

    The Swiss Federal Supreme Court ruled that a police search of a gay couple's home, suspected of a sham marriage, was legal despite lacking a warrant, sparking debate on the balance between privacy rights and immigration enforcement.

    Fallo de la Corte Suprema: dejar WhatsApp abierto en la oficina permite “tácitamente” el acceso de terceros - La Tercera

    latercera.com Law Chile

    The Chilean Supreme Court upheld a lower court ruling that leaving WhatsApp open on a shared work computer implicitly allows third-party access, rejecting a privacy claim by a Carabineros officer.

    Attorney could be suspended for telling opposing lawyer to blow his brains out | Local Las Vegas | Local

    reviewjournal.com Law Nevada

    A Nevada attorney faces a five-year suspension for telling an opposing lawyer to "blow his brains out," a comment made shortly after a fatal shooting at a law office.

    Las dos varas del juez Hurtado | España | EL PAÍS

    elpais.com Law Spain

    This article analyzes the contrasting judicial decisions of Judge Ángel Hurtado, highlighting inconsistencies in his approach to cases involving alleged government secrecy and corruption.

    ‘Liberdade regulada é a única liberdade’, diz Flávio Dino - Estadão

    estadao.com.br Law Brazil

    The Brazilian Supreme Court is debating the responsibility of social media platforms for user-generated content, leading to a discussion about the balance between freedom of speech and online safety.

    Una jueza imputa a un periodista de elDiario.es tras una queja de la pareja de Ayuso por las noticias de la causa contra el fiscal general

    eldiario.es Law Spain

    A Madrid judge has charged several journalists, including one from elDiario.es, following a complaint by Isabel Díaz Ayuso's partner regarding news coverage of a Supreme Court case against the Attorney General.

    Harvey Weinstein Convicted in Mixed Verdict After Sex Crimes Retrial: Live Updates - The New York Times

    nytimes.com Law USA

    Harvey Weinstein's retrial in New York ended in a mixed verdict, following intense jury deliberations marked by conflict and threats, leading to multiple juror requests to speak with the judge.

    Giro en la investigación de la tragedia del Hércules C-130: acusan a Fiscalía de Magallanes de usar un informe plagiado - La Tercera

    latercera.com Law Chile

    The defense in the Hercules C-130 tragedy case accuses the Magallanes Prosecutor's Office of using a plagiarized report, potentially jeopardizing the judicial process.

    How ‘preparation’ for rape differs from ‘attempt’ to commit the crime | Explained News - The Indian Express

    indianexpress.com Law India

    The Supreme Court of India stayed an Allahabad High Court ruling that downplayed the seriousness of acts leading up to attempted rape, highlighting the crucial distinction between 'preparation' and 'attempt' in such crimes.

    To Attract Offense U/S 111(1) BNS Two Or More Persons Must Carry Out Continuous Unlawful Activity Leading To More Than One Chargesheet Within Last 10 Yrs: Kerala HC

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Kerala High Court granted bail to a petitioner accused of organized crime under Section 111(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, determining that the definition of 'continuing unlawful activity' requires more than one charge sheet filed within the preceding ten years.

    "Taśmy Roberta Lewandowskiego" ujawnione. Poznaliśmy bulwersującą treść nagrań - Przegląd Sportowy Onet

    przegladsportowy.onet.pl Law Poland

    Audio recordings of conversations between Robert Lewandowski and his former manager, Cezary Kucharski, were played in court, revealing accusations of tax evasion and blackmail.

    Snipped And Sued: The 10-Second Clip That Sparked A Copyright War

    livelaw.in Law India

    A 10-second video clip used in a longer video has sparked a copyright debate in India, highlighting the need for clearer guidelines on fair use within the country's copyright laws.

    [Order VII Rule 10 & 10A CPC] Suit In New Court Has To Proceed De Novo On Return of Plaint: SC [Read Judgment]

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court clarifies that when a plaint is returned for filing in the correct court, the case must start anew, overruling previous conflicting judgments.

    Harvey Weinstein Retrial: Judge Declares Mistrial on Final Sex Crime Charge - The New York Times

    nytimes.com Law USA

    A mistrial was declared in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial after the jury foreman refused to continue deliberations due to heated disagreements among jurors.

    The Supreme Court’s Inconsistency Is Very Revealing - The Atlantic

    theatlantic.com Law United States

    The Supreme Court's inconsistent application of legal principles, particularly regarding presidential removal power and abortion rights, raises concerns about its commitment to neutrality and the rule of law.

    The Supreme Court’s incoherent new attack on trans rights, in US v. Skrmetti | Vox

    vox.com Law US

    The Supreme Court's decision in US v. Skrmetti upholds state bans on transgender healthcare for minors, employing incoherent legal reasoning and potentially setting a concerning precedent for future discrimination cases.

    No Rigid Rule That Convict Should Undergo Half Of Sentence For Bail At Appellate Stage : Supreme Court

    livelaw.in Law India

    The Supreme Court of India ruled that there's no rigid rule requiring convicts to serve half their sentence before being granted bail during an appeal.