Ben Roberts-Smith appeal dealt blow in Federal Court


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Appeal Setback for Ben Roberts-Smith

Ben Roberts-Smith, a former Australian soldier, faced a blow to his appeal against a defamation ruling that found him guilty of war crimes. The Federal Court initially dismissed his case, concluding he committed multiple war crimes, assaults, and engaged in bullying while serving in Afghanistan.

New Evidence and Subpoenas

Roberts-Smith sought to introduce a recording of journalist Nick McKenzie speaking to a woman (Person 17) with whom Roberts-Smith had an affair. McKenzie allegedly revealed information about Roberts-Smith's legal strategy in the recording. Roberts-Smith's legal team issued wide-ranging subpoenas to McKenzie, his lawyers, Person 17, Roberts-Smith's ex-wife Emma Roberts, her friend Danielle Scott, and the ABC.

Legal Arguments

Roberts-Smith's lawyer described the recording's contents as shocking. The appeal's outcome remains pending.

Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

Disgraced soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has suffered a blow to his plans to appeal against a defamation judgment which found he committed war crimes while on duty in Afghanistan.

The former Special Air Service corporal sued the publisher of this newspaper, then known as Fairfax Media, and The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald investigative journalist Nick McKenzie, after a series of articles alleged Roberts-Smith carried out war crime murders while deployed with the SAS.

Ben Roberts-Smith departs the Federal Court of Australia in Sydney after the first day of his defamation case in 2021.Credit: Brook Mitchell

The Federal Court dismissed the case in June 2023 when a judge found, to the civil standard of the balance of probabilities, that Roberts-Smith had committed multiple war crime murders, assaulted Afghans and engaged in a campaign of bullying against Australian troops a decade earlier.

The Victoria Cross recipient appealed against the judgment and has been waiting for a decision for more than a year.

Last month, he filed an application to reopen his appeal to introduce as evidence a recording of McKenzie speaking to a woman the famed soldier had an affair with, known in the trial as Person 17.

Loading

In the call, McKenzie allegedly says Roberts-Smith’s ex-wife, Emma Roberts, and her close friend, Danielle Scott, were “actively briefing us on his legal strategy in respect of you”.

Roberts-Smith’s legal team on Wednesday defended wide-ranging subpoenas they had issued to McKenzie, the journalist’s lawyers, Person 17, Roberts, Scott, and the ABC.

“To say that (the recording) contents are shocking is an understatement,” Roberts-Smith’s lawyer Arthur Moses, SC, told the court.

Was this article displayed correctly? Not happy with what you see?

We located an Open Access version of this article, legally shared by the author or publisher. Open It
Tabs Reminder: Tabs piling up in your browser? Set a reminder for them, close them and get notified at the right time.

Try our Chrome extension today!


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device