The article explores the effectiveness and ethical implications of 'money saver' modes in air conditioners. The author questions whether these modes genuinely save money or simply compromise user comfort.
The Energy Star certification program, introduced in 2013, mandated energy-efficient modes in air conditioners, leading to the widespread adoption of 'money saver' settings. However, the regulations provided flexibility, allowing manufacturers to implement these modes differently.
The author's investigation revealed varying approaches by different manufacturers. Some simply turn off the fan when the compressor is inactive, while others slow down cooling or adjust the temperature range. The lack of standardization in the implementation of 'money saver' modes is a key concern.
Experts offer conflicting perspectives. Some suggest that the minor temperature fluctuations caused by these modes are barely noticeable and offer modest energy savings. Others argue that these modes sacrifice comfort for minimal energy savings, calling it a deceptive practice.
The author concludes that manually adjusting the thermostat is a more transparent and effective way to save energy than relying on the often misleading 'money saver' modes. The default activation of these modes is also criticized.