This article presents an interview with Philippe Val, where he discusses his perspective on criticizing Israel, particularly in light of rising antisemitism. Val distinguishes between moral and political critiques, arguing that while he does not judge the moral value of his friend Delphine Horvilleur's critique of Israel's policies, he believes its timing is inopportune.
Val argues that a new form of antisemitism, driven by geopolitics, holds all Jews responsible for the actions of the Israeli government. He believes that in this tense climate, any statement that strongly criticizes Israel is unhelpful.
He draws a parallel with Montaigne's decision not to publish La Boétie's work during the religious wars. While respecting Horvilleur's moral standpoint, Val prioritizes a political consideration, emphasizing the risk of fueling antisemitism.
Val clarifies that his criticisms are not about questioning Horvilleur's sincerity, but rather about disagreeing with her view and believing his own view deserves expression. He believes Jews and supporters of Israel should refrain from statements that might worsen the situation.
Val notes that Israel's history makes it unlike other states, considering it a piece of Europe in the Middle East with cultural ties to European civilization. He concludes that demanding that Israel be exceptional is unrealistic.
Finally, Val expresses his unrelenting fight against left-wing antisemitism, drawing inspiration from Winston Churchill's perseverance. He likens this fight to tending a garden, constantly battling against the return of negativity.
Join other readers saving clean, clutter-free articles. Save articles, get AI summaries, and sync automatically across all your devices.
Continue with Google