Pandemic Revisionism, Part One: COVID-19 Origins | by Gideon M-K; Health Nerd | Jul, 2025 | Medium

See original article

Key Arguments

The author, an epidemiologist, explains their reluctance to discuss COVID-19 origins due to a lack of virological expertise and a belief that regulatory improvements are more crucial than pinpointing the exact cause. A recent Guardian article prompted them to address the issue. They intend to write a series on pandemic revisionism, starting with the origins debate.

Main Points

  • The author acknowledges their expertise in epidemiology but lacks the current virological knowledge for a thorough assessment.
  • They believe that improved regulations for wet markets and global laboratories are paramount, regardless of the pandemic's origin.
  • The author criticizes the current discourse on COVID-19 origins as being largely inaccurate.
  • A future series will delve deeper into 'pandemic revisionism'.
Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features