Why Trump is suddenly fixated on how many dolls kids should have | CNN Business


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Trump's Doll Discourse: A Distraction?

The article analyzes President Trump's unexpected fixation on the number of dolls children should possess, linking it to his defense of controversial tariffs. Trump's comments, suggesting a limited number of dolls for girls, are presented as a misdirection tactic, deflecting criticism of the economic impact of his trade policies.

Economic Implications and Gender Dynamics

Trump's administration argues that the tariffs will revive jobs in traditionally male-dominated industries. However, the article points out that rising prices for various goods, not just dolls, are a consequence of these policies. The focus on dolls is interpreted as an attempt to portray concerns about material possessions as feminine and thus undesirable.

Criticism and Backlash

The article highlights criticism of Trump's rhetoric from various sources. Leah Greenberg of Indivisible suggests that the doll example is a tactic to deflect criticism by framing concern about the rising cost of goods as 'feminine'. Even some Republican lawmakers are reportedly expressing private concerns that the message is out of touch. The article notes the irony of the message coming from wealthy officials like Trump and Treasury Secretary Bessent.

  • Criticism of the message as out of touch.
  • Irony of wealthy officials promoting austerity.
  • The potential for rising prices impacting various goods.
Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

A version of this story appeared in CNN Business’ Nightcap newsletter. To get it in your inbox, sign up for free here.

New York CNN  — 

The president wants to make two things clear: His tariffs are the most important reordering of global trade the world has ever seen. And his tariffs are not that big of a deal, if you’re man enough.

It’s just one of the many manosphere-coded talking points coming out of the White House and its right-wing media fans to defend radical tariffs that Trump claims will revive rugged, traditionally male-dominated jobs in factories.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, between rounds of congressional testimony, went on Fox News — where hosts have spun Trump’s tariffs as the “ultimate testosterone boost” — to reiterate Trump’s suddenly very pronounced opinions about the appropriate number of toys children should have.

Trump probably wasn’t supposed to admit on camera that his signature economic policy would cause prices to go up. But rather than spin it, Trump and Co. have doubled down.

“All I’m saying is that a young lady, a 10-year-old girl, 9-year-old girl, 15-year-old girl, doesn’t need 37 dolls,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday. Earlier, he told NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “I don’t think that a beautiful baby girl needs — that’s 11 years old — needs to have 30 dolls. I think they can have three dolls or four dolls because what we were doing with China was just unbelievable.”

But the administration’s emphasis on toys for girls is no gaffe. It is an attempt at misdirection that’s squarely in line with the MAGA right’s obsession with traditional, binary gender expressions.

“The reason they keep using dolls as their example is because they’re trying to frame caring about material stuff as feminine and thus inherently shameful,” wrote Leah Greenberg, co-founder and co-executive director of the progressive organizing group Indivisible, on Bluesky.

By focusing on dolls and girls, Trump’s message of austerity becomes less about sacrificing for his trade war and morphs into more of a taunt: “What are you afraid of, your kid won’t have dolls to play with?”

And it conveniently leaves out all the other essentials — clothes, cars, homebuilding materials, fruits and vegetables — that will become scarcer or more expensive on his watch.

On Fox Tuesday, Bessent took the point further.

To any kids who are sad about getting fewer dolls, Bessent would say: “You will have a better life than your parents” and “your family will own a home” because of the “economic freedom” Trump is creating.

Ah, yes, the freedom to work in a factory, despite most Americans saying they do not want to work in a factory.

Even some Republican lawmakers are getting annoyed with all the doll discourse. According to The Hill, GOP members of Congress who have been largely in lockstep with Trump are grumbling behind closed doors that the message of sacrifice comes off as out of touch.

It shouldn’t be hard to see why the “two dolls” line is falling flat, coming from some of the wealthiest officials in American in history.

Bessent is a Yale grad who amassed his multimillion-dollar fortune on Wall Street. And Trump is a crypto-peddling hotel-and-casino mogul who’s planning to spend untold amounts of taxpayer money on a military parade for his birthday next month.

Is that something a 78-year-old man needs?

Was this article displayed correctly? Not happy with what you see?

Tabs Reminder: Tabs piling up in your browser? Set a reminder for them, close them and get notified at the right time.

Try our Chrome extension today!


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device