Why Duolingo isn't helping you learn a foreign language | The Spectator


This article argues that Duolingo, despite its popularity, is an inefficient method for learning a foreign language, suggesting alternative approaches.
AI Summary available — skim the key points instantly. Show AI Generated Summary
Show AI Generated Summary

Duolingo claims that it is ā€˜the world’s best way to learn a language’. The app – which has tens of millions of users – boasts a ā€˜science-backed approach’ that it says ā€˜delivers measurable results’. I’m not convinced: it seems to me that time wasted on Duolingo would be far better spent doing almost anything else.

Busy people, of course, can’t be expected to learn languages the most efficient way: dropping everything to spend some time in a foreign country and learn by immersion. But flickingĀ through one of those kitsch phrasebooks, or listening to a podcast in another language, slowed down to 0.5x speed if necessary, is probably more likely to help your language skills, in a way that is better tailored to your abilities and interests, than five minutes a day on Duolingo.

Millions have been taken in by Duolingo and its marketing gimmicks

Yet millions have been taken in by Duolingo and its marketing gimmicks.

Was this article displayed correctly? Not happy with what you see?

Tabs Reminder: Tabs piling up in your browser? Set a reminder for them, close them and get notified at the right time.

Try our Chrome extension today!


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device