Water companies ‘sold off reservoirs that could have eased drought’


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Water Companies' Actions

The article details how UK water companies have faced pressure to close old reservoirs to reduce costs and have faced scrutiny regarding the financial viability of new ones. This has resulted in a lack of new reservoir construction despite increasing need due to climate change and population growth.

Criticism and Consequences

Critics argue that this prioritization of short-term profits over long-term water supply has left the UK vulnerable to droughts. The lack of investment in new infrastructure is highlighted, with only one new reservoir project currently having planning permission. This inaction is contrasted with private landowners who have proactively built reservoirs on their land.

Environmental Concerns

The article also touches upon the broader issue of water pollution in the UK, mentioning concerns regarding sewage, agricultural waste, and other pollutants contaminating rivers. This further emphasizes the need for improved water management practices.

Proposed Solutions

One suggested solution is to simplify the bureaucratic processes for approving new reservoir projects. While the water industry body notes the existence of new proposals under consideration, concerns remain regarding the pace of action and the effectiveness of current regulatory frameworks.

Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

Water industry sources said companies faced pressure from Ofwat to close old facilities to save money, as well as scrutiny from the regulator over the financial benefit of opening new ones. 

Water companies say they face widespread opposition in building new reservoir facilities, despite a recognition they will be increasingly needed under drier conditions as a result of climate change. 

Thames Water has spent more than a decade attempting to construct a £1 billion reservoir to serve more than eight million people in Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The plans were first rejected by the government in 2011 and have been the subject of local opposition. 

There are plans for a handful of new reservoirs across the country, but only one - the £100 million Havant Thicket project, near Portsmouth - actually has planning permission.  

“We need to make the bureaucratic hoops easier,” said Mr Hughes. 

A spokesman for Water UK, the industry body, said reservoirs were “just one of the sources used to supply water to customers”.

The spokesman added: “New reservoirs are subject to lengthy scrutiny from regulators about their near-term need and value for money, as well as planning permission. 

“One new reservoir - Havant Thicket – is due to be completed by the end of this decade, and companies have made a further 18 proposals which are under consideration in a new streamlined arrangement introduced by regulators to speed-up and facilitate their decision-making and make it more likely that projects can proceed.”

Companies ‘put short-term profits ahead of long-term water supply’

By Andrew Sells, chairman of Natural England from 2014 to 2019

Fifty years ago, my father had a small business in East Anglia which built lakes, including those at Balmoral and the RSPB headquarters in Bedfordshire. 

In the subsequent half a century, many farmers across the country have learned the lessons of droughts in winter as well as summer, and built reservoirs on their land. 

At the same time, several of our water companies preferred to build houses on some of their reservoirs (Thames Water refuses to say how many) and last week we learnt that together they have built precisely zero new reservoirs in the last 30 years, despite population growth of about 10 million. 

No doubt some reservoirs had reached the end of their working lives - but in abandoning this critical infrastructure, without any replacements, they have again put short-term profits ahead of long-term water supply. 

Long before this news came, the water companies were in the politicians’ sights. In January, the environmental audit committee found that a “chemical cocktail” of sewage, agricultural waste, plastic and persistent chemicals was polluting our rivers and concluded that “the public are rightly shocked when they discover that untreated or partially treated sewage is dumped into rivers”.

Was this article displayed correctly? Not happy with what you see?

Tabs Reminder: Tabs piling up in your browser? Set a reminder for them, close them and get notified at the right time.

Try our Chrome extension today!


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device