Teals call push polls “affront to democracy”


Australian Teal independent MPs condemn recent push polls as undemocratic and unethical, sparking a debate about campaign tactics and the role of organizations like Climate 200.
AI Summary available — skim the key points instantly. Show AI Generated Summary
Show AI Generated Summary

“The CSIRO have estimated that it will cost $600 billion to build and roll out the Liberals’ nuclear plan of the following. How would you most like to see their nuclear plan paid for?”

Loading

Modelling released by the Coalition from Frontier Economics predicts its nuclear policy will be 44 per cent cheaper than Labor’s renewables-led plan over coming decades.

Last month, The Guardian reported a separate push poll that criticised teals such as Daniel and Wentworth’s Allegra Spender.

That robocall asked if teal MPs receiving funding from Climate 200 made them less independent. Daniel at the time described the survey as “dirty tactics”. “I think it’s unethical, and I think it’s an affront to democracy, and I think it’s insulting to voters,” she said.

Teal sources familiar with the polls said Climate 200 was responsible. The organisation, which is funding dozens of teal campaigns including Daniel’s, declined to comment.

Loading

Push polls targeting voters in Liberal frontbencher Dan Tehan’s Victorian seat of Wannon and his colleague Julian Leeser’s Sydney seat of Berowra have previously been reported.

Coalition campaign spokesman James Paterson said Daniel’s supporters were “push polling” voters with misleading questions.

“That’s not just hypocrisy – it’s cynical, desperate politics from someone who claimed to be better than this,” Paterson said. “If Zoe Daniel wants to talk about integrity, she should start by practising it.”

Polling company uComms, which deployed the poll for Climate 200, defended its surveys.

“All uComms polls are composed in accordance with guidelines set down by the Australian Polling Council (APC), of which uComms is a founding member,” the chief executive of its parent company, Logan Leatch, said in an email. “Under the APC guidelines, demographic and voter intention questions must be asked first to avoid bias.”

“UComms is dedicated to providing accurate results,” Leatch said.

Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter.

Was this article displayed correctly? Not happy with what you see?

Tabs Reminder: Tabs piling up in your browser? Set a reminder for them, close them and get notified at the right time.

Try our Chrome extension today!


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device