Page Reader AI | Rishi Sunak accused of concealment culture after record number of FoI blocks | Freedom of information

Rishi Sunak accused of concealment culture after record number of FoI blocks | Freedom of information | The Guardian

AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Key Findings

Rishi Sunak's government achieved a record low in fulfilling freedom of information requests during its first three months, with only 33.6% of requests fully granted. This is significantly lower than previous administrations, including 56% under David Cameron and 43% under Boris Johnson.

Criticism and Accusations

The Labour party criticized the lack of transparency, contrasting it with Sunak's promise of an 'integrity, professionalism and accountability' government. They highlighted a concerning drop in information release rates across various government departments, particularly the Treasury.

Government Response

The government defended its actions, citing high request numbers and the need to protect national security and personal data. They also emphasized the proactive release of information outside the scope of the Freedom of Information Act.

Wider Concerns

The article highlights a broader concern regarding the UK's freedom of information laws, referencing a previous open letter signed by numerous journalists, politicians, and campaigners warning of obstructions to lawful requests.

Data Points

33.6% of requests fully granted in the first quarter of Sunak's premiership.
18% rate of information granted by the Treasury in the first quarter.
86% of requests responded to in time.
Record high number of requests received, a 24% increase year-on-year.

Rishi Sunak’s government placed a record number of blocks on freedom of information requests in its first three months, leading to accusations of a “culture of concealment”.

New figures show that the government gave out information in full in only 33.6% of cases in which it held the data during the first three months of Sunak’s administration. Just 3,895 of 11,597 “resolvable requests” were granted in full.

It represents a record low for freedom of information requests, compared with a 56% rate of information published in full in David Cameron’s first quarter as prime minister, 44% under Theresa May, and 43% under Boris Johnson, according to data on requests to central government departments and bodies.

Labour criticised Sunak’s lack of transparency, saying it undermined the prime minister’s promise on taking office that he would run a government of “integrity, professionalism and accountability at every level”.

Graphic

The opposition also highlighted figures from April showing that during Sunak’s time as chancellor, the Treasury plunged from the middle to the bottom of the Whitehall rankings for the percentage of information requests granted.

Over the course of the whole of last year, the proportion of information requests granted in full by Whitehall departments hit a record low of 39%, down from 40% the year before. But from January to March 2023, the government’s transparency rate fell again to just 33.6%.

The Treasury remains at the bottom with an 18% rate of granting information during the first quarter of the year, compared with 80% of requests answered in full by the Wales Office and 71% by the attorney general’s office.

Overall, a record number of requests were received, 16,853, which is an increase of 24% compared with the same quarter the year before.

Contact the team securely: create a Protonmail account and email us at guardian.politics.desk@protonmail.com; or use Signal Messenger or WhatsApp to message +44 7824 537227.

Angela Rayner, Labour’s deputy leader, said: “The culture of concealment that Rishi Sunak embedded at the Treasury is now creeping its way across the whole of Whitehall. No sooner has he got behind the desk in 10 Downing Street than the flow of information disclosures from the government has dried up.

“During his time as chancellor, we saw him desperately attempting to cover up the evidence of his incompetent management of the economy and his flagrant waste of public money. And now as prime minister, it is the failures of the whole government he is trying to hide.”

skip past newsletter promotionSign up to First EditionOur morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it mattersPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

after newsletter promotion

In response, a government spokesperson said: “This government is committed to transparency. That is why, despite receiving the highest number of FoI requests on record in the first quarter of this year, 86% were responded to in time.

“We also proactively publish more information outside of the Freedom of Information Act than ever before.

“Where requests for information are refused, reasons can include national security implications, protecting personal information and requests where the relevant information has already been published.”

The government has increasingly been criticised over its approach to freedom of information in recent years, particularly its use of a central “clearing house” to approve the release of material.

Last year, more than 100 journalists, politicians and campaigners signed an open letter warning that the UK’s freedom of information laws were being undermined by a lack of resources and government departments obstructing lawful requests.

The signatories include the editor-in-chief of the Guardian, Katharine Viner, the editor of the Observer, Paul Webster, as well as the shadow solicitor general, Andy Slaughter, the former Brexit secretary David Davis, and the former Green party leader Caroline Lucas.