The author, an epidemiologist, explains their reluctance to discuss COVID-19 origins due to a lack of virological expertise and a belief that regulatory improvements are more crucial than pinpointing the exact cause. A recent Guardian article prompted them to address the issue. They intend to write a series on pandemic revisionism, starting with the origins debate.
I have, for five years, studiously avoided writing anything about the origins of COVID-19. There are a few reasons for this. I’m not really qualified to comment. While I’m an expert on epidemiology who worked on COVID-19 during the pandemic, I’m not a virologist and much of the discussion is about viral RNA. It’s been 15 years since I spent any real time in a lab, so much of the more in-depth virological data is hard for me to properly assess. Not impossible, but hard.
I also genuinely don’t really care what started the pandemic. People are always shocked when they hear this, but to me it doesn’t matter that much. We know that wet markets should be better regulated and that globally laboratories should have strong oversight — these are both true regardless of what precisely caused the pandemic.
But a recent piece in the Guardian irritated me enough that I feel like I have to write about it. And since I’ve been thinking about writing a series on the current revisionist history of the pandemic, this might as well be the first piece. So let’s look at the origins of COVID-19 and why most of the current discourse is wildly off the mark.
Before we start, I should reiterate that I’m not the definitive word on this…
If you often open multiple tabs and struggle to keep track of them, Tabs Reminder is the solution you need. Tabs Reminder lets you set reminders for tabs so you can close them and get notified about them later. Never lose track of important tabs again with Tabs Reminder!
Try our Chrome extension today!
Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more