Opinion | The Face-Plant President - The New York Times


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Key Issues with the Trump Administration

This opinion piece from The New York Times criticizes the Trump administration's leadership, citing two key examples: the Pentagon's alleged mismanagement and the president's attacks on the Federal Reserve Chairman, Jerome Powell.

Pentagon Mismanagement

The article highlights the revelation of Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of Defense, sharing sensitive information via a Signal group chat and a subsequent Politico article detailing a "full-blown meltdown at the Pentagon," leading to the firing of three top officials. The author suggests this reflects the administration's preference for less competent and therefore less threatening subordinates.

  • Sensitive information shared inappropriately
  • Firing of top Pentagon officials
  • Focus on subservience over competence

Economic Instability

The author points to President Trump's attacks on Jerome Powell, the Fed chairman, and the consequent market rout and dollar plunge. Trump's outrage stemmed from Powell's assessment of the president's tariffs and their negative economic consequences. This event is presented as another instance of the administration's poor handling of critical situations.

  • Market rout and dollar plunge following Trump's attacks on Powell
  • Potential assault on central bank independence
  • Focus on personal attacks rather than addressing economic concerns

Underlying Theme: Lack of Adult Supervision

The central argument is that the Trump administration is fundamentally characterized by a lack of adult supervision. This is exemplified by the placement of unqualified individuals in crucial positions and the lack of accountability. The author emphasizes the preference for loyalists over competent professionals.

Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

Harold Macmillan, the midcentury British prime minister, supposedly said that what statesmen feared most were “events, dear boy, events.” Misfortunes happen: a natural disaster, a terrorist attack, a foreign crisis. Political leaders are judged by how adroitly or incompetently they handle the unexpected.

Luckily, the Trump administration hasn’t yet had such misfortunes. Its only misfortune — and therefore everyone else’s — is itself.

So much has been obvious again this week, thanks to two stories that are, at their core, the same. First, there was the revelation that Pete Hegseth, the secretary of defense, had shared sensitive details of the military strike on Yemen with his wife, brother and personal lawyer on yet another Signal group chat. That was followed by an essay in Politico from a former close aide to Hegseth, John Ullyot, describing a “full-blown meltdown at the Pentagon” — a meltdown that included the firing of three of the department’s top officials. Donald Trump Jr. responded by saying Ullyot is “officially exiled from our movement.”

Then there was a market rout and a dollar plunge, thanks to President Trump’s unseemly and unhinged attacks on Jerome Powell, the Fed chairman. Powell’s sin was to have the audacity to describe the probable effects of the president’s tariffs: namely, that they’ll cause prices to go up and growth to slow down. This sent Trump into a rage, complete with White House threats to examine whether Powell can be fired — a potential assault on central bank independence worthy of the worst economic days of Argentina.

Both cases are about adult supervision: the absence of it in the first instance, the presence of it in the other and the president’s strong preference for the former. Why? Probably for the same reason that tin-pot dictators elevate incompetent toadies to top security posts: They are more dependent and less of a threat. The last thing Trump wants at the Pentagon is another Jim Mattis, secure enough in himself to be willing to resign on principle.

The same goes for other departments of government.

An adult secretary of state would never have allowed his department to be gutted in its first weeks by an unofficial official (Elon Musk) from a so-called department (DOGE) by unaccountable teenage employees with nicknames like Big Balls. But Marco Rubio has a moniker with a very different meaning, Little Marco. He’ll do as he’s told right until he’s fired, probably (like one of his predecessors, Rex Tillerson) via a social media post.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Was this article displayed correctly? Not happy with what you see?

Tabs Reminder: Tabs piling up in your browser? Set a reminder for them, close them and get notified at the right time.

Try our Chrome extension today!


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device