New Zealand teachers are voicing significant concerns regarding the implementation of a new curriculum. The main issues revolve around inadequate training and resources, leading to an unsustainable workload. Teachers feel they are expected to implement 80% of a changed job while still performing their existing roles without proper support.
The government's lack of guidance on assessing and reporting the new curriculum leaves schools in limbo. Teachers struggle to find suitable maths programmes and must divert funds from other budgets to purchase necessary literacy resources. The current assessment methods are deemed largely incompatible with the new curriculum.
The excessive workload is a major concern, forcing teachers to work additional hours after school and potentially leading to burnout and staff shortages. The current system is described as 'impossible' to manage without sacrificing other essential tasks. Many teachers are considering leaving the profession due to the increased pressure.
Teachers suggest several solutions: reviewing and possibly adapting existing overseas assessments to better suit New Zealand's needs, streamlining assessments to focus on key indicators, and providing more non-contact time for planning and professional development. A teacher apprenticeship model is also proposed to attract and retain talent. Finally, increased teacher pay is advocated to reflect the value of their profession and prevent further exodus to countries with better conditions.
The article highlights the issue of teacher pay in New Zealand, comparing it unfavorably with that in Australia. While increased non-contact time is acknowledged as a positive step, the overarching concern remains the need for fair compensation that acknowledges the demanding nature of the job and the long-term investment in children's education.
It would be like if our job was in the corporate world and suddenly your boss said to you: āOkay, 80% of your job is changing, but youāve got to learn it on the job, but youāve still got to do your old job at the same timeā. You just literally couldnāt do it.
Thatās how it feels at the moment. The Government still hasnāt told us how to assess this new curriculum or how to report it to parents. So schools are in a limbo year in terms of assessing and reporting.
Now, how do we actually teach it in the classroom so it matches the new curriculum and the new approach? Itās a totally different way of teaching maths as well, so schools are having to choose which maths programme and provider they are going to use, but without really knowing which one best matches the needs of the school. If you overload teachers with maths PD (professional development), reading PD, writing PD, theyāre going to leave, and there are not enough teachers in New Zealand as it is.
The teachers need good PD and the right resources to make it work. At the moment we donāt have enough resources. We have to scrape money from all budgets to buy the specific decodable literacy books to match what we want and need, because the Government doesnāt provide enough funding for these resources.
We donāt send our structured literacy books home as readers. We simply canāt afford to. If your principal just said: āWeāre doing the new curriculums; hereās maths PD, hereās reading PD, hereās Zooms to do after school, hereās all the assessment weāre going to do because weāve been told toā¦ā, you couldnāt do it all. You would be studying every single day after school, plus doing the old planning and lessons you did before, because you still canāt throw it out yet.
You need a good management team that says, āIf weāre going to do that assessment, weāre going to stop this one.ā We canāt do it all, because itās impossible. I think thatās the biggest thing. Weāve had standardised assessments in New Zealand for years, but they need to rethink about which ones we actually need. Which ones inform teaching and show progress and which ones are just ticking the boxes and reporting to the Government because weāve always done them?
Discover moreMany of the old assessments simply do not match the new curriculums and so are becoming redundant. Itās time to look at assessments that do the job we want, and yes this might mean looking at overseas assessments, as many of their assessments have been tried and tested on millions of children, which NZ simply canāt do.
Why create something new when we can simply modify an assessment to match New Zealand children and our ethnic diversity?
If we had to implement every single thing weāve been told to, teachers would leave. Itās just too much.
At the back of a teacherās mind is always the thought ... If and when the Government changes, will there be another refresh? Have we done all this hard work for nothing? Why is education a political issue?
The best thing that happened to teachers was with our last negotiation we got more non-contact time or classroom release time. Back when I started teaching, I got one day a term to watch other teachers, do professional development or test my own class. Many times my class was left with busy work while I tested one child at a time.
We are now getting five days a term, right, which is amazing. Itās increased for the last three years, but actually itās amazing. I get released with the other teacher that I work with and itās such a valuable time. We can plan topics and units together, we talk to each other about what weāve noticed about our kids academically, socially and emotionally and where extra support is needed. This time is spent on assessments, observing other teachers in the school that we might never get to see teach, attending PD, meeting with parents and other agencies.
So itās actually the best thing to ease teachersā workload because youāre not having to play catch-up all the time. It actually gives you time to do something well and to test your kids in a quiet environment and not just test one while the rest of your kids are busy doing some independent thing. So that has been, I think, a game-changer for lots of teachers in reducing stress and workload.ā
If Iām sick and they get a reliever to cover my class, they get paid for five hours. They actually get paid five hours for the day. So, technically, that means I get paid for five hours a day. Now, a teacher would never do just five hours a day, even if they only arrived at school the minute it started, because thereās actually more than five hours in the school day and teachers are usually on playground duty at break times, or taking a lunchtime club or sports training. I could get into more detail about teachersā pay but thatās an article in itself.
At the moment, the teacher population is ageing. I think the average age is around 50-55 years old in New Zealand, and not many people are training to be teachers at all. So when they retire, who or what are we going to have in front of our classrooms? No one.
At our school, weāve lost a few teachers. They trained, they did their two years to get registered, then they left for Australia. They can do exactly the same job with more release and earn 20 grand more. So why would you stay here?
We should be having teaching apprenticeships where teachers train both at uni and in a certain school over a number of years so that they get both the theory and hands-on experience. They could then be bonded for a certain time to a school or an area, and then at least youād be retaining teachers. This model might also encourage people to go into the teaching profession, especially if fees were paid or they were given an allowance like an apprenticeship.
They might reach the end of their bond and leave, but then again they might not. They might think that, actually, New Zealandās great.
Or, by then, maybe our Government would have caught up with what the going rate is and pay teachers as the professionals they are and what we are really worth. How much are generations of well-educated children worth to society?
Skip the extension ā just come straight here.
Weāve built a fast, permanent tool you can bookmark and use anytime.
Go To Paywall Unblock Tool