Months cut off sex offender sentence | Otago Daily Times Online News


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Key Points

Jamie Michael Eder, 48, received a reduced prison sentence for multiple counts of child sexual abuse. His original 29-month sentence was reduced to 25 months by Justice Cameron Mander.

The Offenses

The abuse began in the early 1990s when Eder was 13 and involved numerous incidents with a young girl. Eder's actions escalated from inappropriate touching to sexual acts.

The Sentencing

Justice Mander found that the sentencing judge's starting point was too high. While acknowledging Eder's youth at the time of the offenses, good character since, remorse, and reparation, the judge did not grant any additional credit. Eder's sentence reduction resulted from a recalculation of the starting point rather than additional concessions.

Victim's Statement

The victim stated, “I don’t hate Jamie, I hate that he abused me. The only thing I can do is make sure everybody knows what he did to me.”

Legal Arguments

Defense counsel argued for home detention, emphasizing Eder's young age at the time of the offense and his good character thereafter.

Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

A Dunedin man who sexually abused a girl on dozens of occasions has had four months shaved off his prison sentence.

In December, Jamie Michael Eder, 48, was jailed for 29 months after he admitted sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection — a charge which represented dozens of incidents with the same victim.

The offending began in the early 1990s when Eder was just 13.

He would convince the young girl to take her clothes off, then "examine" her.

This progressed to Eder having the girl perform sex acts on him.

At sentencing the victim said: "I don’t hate Jamie, I hate that he abused me".

"The only thing I can do is make sure everybody knows what he did to me."

Counsel John Westgate said his client deserved more credit because he was very young when he offended and he was otherwise of good character.

He argued home detention should be the final sentence for Eder.

In a decision released this month, Justice Cameron Mander said the sentencing judge’s starting point in the sentencing calculations was too high.

"The margins are fine, but material, and I consider some adjustment is required to avoid an excessive starting point," he said.

But he did not believe Eder should be afforded any more credit.

"Mr Eder, in total, received a combined 62% deduction to his sentence for his guilty plea and personal circumstances that included his youth at the time, his good character since his offending, and remorse and reparation," Justice Mander said.

Justice Mander quashed the original sentence and instead imposed 25 months’ imprisonment.

felicity.dear@odt.co.nz

Was this article displayed correctly? Not happy with what you see?

Tabs Reminder: Tabs piling up in your browser? Set a reminder for them, close them and get notified at the right time.

Try our Chrome extension today!


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device