Judge Limits Trump’s Ability to Withhold School Funds Over D.E.I. - The New York Times


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Key Ruling

A federal judge, Landya B. McCafferty, limited the Trump administration's ability to withhold federal funds from schools with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. The judge argued that the administration's definition of DEI was insufficiently detailed, that the policy threatened free speech, and that it overstepped the executive branch's authority.

Financial Impact

The judge noted that the loss of federal funding would severely impact many educational institutions. The administration's demand for states to attest that their schools don't use DEI practices violating Trump's interpretation of civil rights law, or risk losing billions in Title I funds, prompted a lawsuit.

Scope of the Decision

While Judge McCafferty didn't issue a nationwide pause, her ruling specifically protects schools employing members of the groups that brought the lawsuit: the National Education Association and the Center for Black Educator Development. Given the NEA's vast membership, this ruling likely affects many school districts.

Groups Involved

  • National Education Association (NEA)
  • Center for Black Educator Development
Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

A federal judge in New Hampshire limited on Thursday the Trump administration’s ability to withhold federal funds from public schools that have certain diversity and equity initiatives.

The judge, Landya B. McCafferty, said that the administration had not provided an adequately detailed definition of “diversity, equity and inclusion,” and that its policy threatened to restrict free speech in the classroom while overstepping the executive branch’s legal authority over local schools.

She also wrote that the loss of federal funding “would cripple the operations of many educational institutions.”

The decision followed a demand earlier this month by the Trump administration that all 50 state education agencies attest that their schools do not use D.E.I. practices that violate President Trump’s interpretation of civil rights law. Otherwise, they would risk losing billions in Title I money, which is targeted toward low-income students. About a dozen states, mostly Democratic leaning, refused to sign the document.

In issuing her decision, Judge McCafferty declined to issue a nationwide pause on the policy. Instead, she limited her ruling to schools that employ or contract with at least one member of the groups that brought the lawsuit: the National Education Association, the nation’s largest teachers’ union, and the Center for Black Educator Development, a nonprofit that seeks to recruit and train Black teachers.

The N.E.A. has about three million members, including some in states that bar teachers from collective bargaining. It is possible that most school districts in the nation would be affected by the ruling.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Was this article displayed correctly? Not happy with what you see?

Tabs Reminder: Tabs piling up in your browser? Set a reminder for them, close them and get notified at the right time.

Try our Chrome extension today!


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device