Friendly Memo to President Trump: Why Not Reward Success, Not Punish It? | The New York Sun


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Argument Against Tax Increases for the Wealthy

The article presents an argument against increasing taxes on the wealthy, particularly focusing on a potential 'millionaire's tax'. It contends that such a tax would harm small businesses (pass-through entities), which constitute a majority of American businesses and employ a significant portion of the workforce.

Economic Concerns

The author highlights concerns that increasing taxes on the wealthy would negatively impact job creation and wages, citing the significant number of small businesses that would bear the brunt of such tax increases. The economic argument is grounded in supply-side economics, emphasizing the disincentive effects of higher taxation on successful entrepreneurs and job creators.

Political Concerns

The piece also discusses the political ramifications, suggesting that a millionaire's tax would further divide Republicans, potentially jeopardizing the passage of broader tax legislation. It points out the risk of triggering a larger tax increase that would benefit Democrats.

Conclusion

The author concludes by expressing hope that the tax bill will ultimately cut taxes and encourage deregulation, leading to economic growth and the creation of jobs. The underlying message is one of rewarding success and entrepreneurship rather than punishing it through higher taxation.

Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

So I guess it wouldn’t be any fun if a big beautiful tax bill going through the legislative meat grinder wasn’t rife with rumors about tax hikes. 

And President Trump is kind of playing both sides of the issue by saying that he would be in favor of, let me quote: “A tiny tax increase for the rich, which I and all others would graciously accept in order to help the lower and middle income workers.”

Yet Mr. Trump notes that the “problem” would be “that the radical left Democratic lunatics would go around screaming, ‘Read my lips,’ the fabled quote by George Bush the elder that is said to have cost him the election.”

Mr. Trump concludes: “No, Ross Perot cost him the election. In any event, Republicans should probably not do it, but I’m okay if they do.”

Well, alright, kind of playing both sides of the story there, isn’t he? 

Yet our sources now tell us that Speaker  Johnson and the House majority leader, Steve Scalise, have buried the idea of a millionaire’s tax or a special high-end tax bracket, and that is good news indeed. 

Frankly, I think a millionaire’s tax bracket would just unnecessarily divide the Senate and House Republicans, most of whom have signed on to Grover Norquist’s taxpayer protection pledge. 

And that would risk an entire blowup with the reconciliation bill, and that would risk a $4 trillion or $5 trillion tax hike, which would let the Democrats completely off the hook. 

But the economics of an increased tax on the wealthy are just as bad as the politics. 

Small businesses, the so-called passthrough businesses, think LLCs or Subchapter S companies, they don’t pay the corporate tax.

Their earnings are reported on the owner’s tax returns, and hence the small business owners pay the individual income tax. 

Now, according to the Tax Foundation, more than 90 percent of American businesses are organized as passthrough companies, and they would bear the brunt as some kind of new millionaire tax bracket. 

Meanwhile, these passthrough companies employ almost half of the entire American workforce, so higher taxes on those entities would mean less hiring and lower wages. 

Now, Art Laffer has often said the top tax rate is perhaps the most important tax of all. 

And that’s not only because of the incentive effect, of course, if you tax something less you get more of it, but if you tax something more, you get less of it, but also, those are the successful entrepreneurs and economic activists who create the jobs and the incomes for the middle and lower middle income folks. 

So why punish success? 

We should be rewarding success and rewarding entrepreneurship from startup LLC companies

that, you know, within a year or two or three could balloon into huge successes, but they’d be faced

with punitive taxation. 

That’s an example of socialist economics, not supply side capitalist economics. 

So hopefully, the entire big beautiful bill will remain a tax cutting bill and a deregulation bill that will grow the economy by leaps and bounds and give us the blue-collar boom that everybody’s hoping for.

From Mr. Kudlow’s broadcast on Fox Business Network.

Was this article displayed correctly? Not happy with what you see?

We located an Open Access version of this article, legally shared by the author or publisher. Open It
Tabs Reminder: Tabs piling up in your browser? Set a reminder for them, close them and get notified at the right time.

Try our Chrome extension today!


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device