China and Russia Keep Their Distance From Iran During Crisis - The New York Times


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Key Findings

This article analyzes the relationship between China, Russia, and Iran, challenging the notion of a unified 'axis' of authoritarian powers. While these countries initially appeared aligned against the West, their actions during Iran's conflicts with Israel and the US demonstrate a lack of substantial support from China and Russia.

Limited Support for Iran

Despite Iran's provision of drones and missiles to Russia and oil to China, neither China nor Russia intervened militarily or provided significant aid to Iran during its conflicts. Their responses were limited to pro forma condemnations of US actions.

Self-Interest and Limitations of the 'Axis'

Experts, such as Alexander Gabuev, highlight the self-interested nature of these nations and the limitations of the 'axis' concept. Each country prioritizes its own interests, and the diverse nature of their conflicts prevents a unified response or shared values similar to alliances like those between the US and its allies.

  • China and Russia did not materially aid Iran during conflicts with Israel and the US.
  • Their support for Iran was primarily symbolic, lacking significant military or economic intervention.
  • The differing conflicts and national interests limit the strength and cohesion of any potential alliance.
Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

When Russia enlisted the aid of China, North Korea and Iran in its war against Ukraine, some American and British officials began talking about a new “axis.”

It appeared that the four countries were united by anger, authoritarianism and animus against the United States and its allies.

But Iran’s sales of drones and ballistic missiles to Russia for its war and oil shipped to China did not pay off when it mattered, raising doubts about unity among the nations.

None of the other three states rushed to aid Iran during its war with Israel or when U.S. forces bombed Iranian nuclear sites. China and Russia, by far the two most powerful countries among the four, issued pro forma denunciations of the American actions but did not lift a finger to materially help Iran.

“The reality of this conflict turned out to be that Russia and China didn’t run to Iran’s rescue,” said Alexander Gabuev, the director of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center. “That just exposes the limitations of the whole ‘axis’ idea.”

“Each of them is pretty selfish and doesn’t want to get embroiled in the wars of others,” he added. “These are very different wars and different sets of conflicts. The countries are not necessarily sharing the same structures and values and institutional links the same way the U.S. and its allies do.”

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Was this article displayed correctly? Not happy with what you see?

Tabs Reminder: Tabs piling up in your browser? Set a reminder for them, close them and get notified at the right time.

Try our Chrome extension today!


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device