British Gallery Turns Down $1.3 Million Sackler Donation - The New York Times


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Key Decision

The National Portrait Gallery in London rejected a $1.3 million donation from the Sackler Trust, a charitable arm of the Sackler family, known for their links to Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin. This decision, mutually agreed upon, follows growing controversy surrounding the family's role in the opioid crisis.

Reasons for Rejection

While the Sackler Trust denied allegations against the family, the Gallery cited a desire to avoid distraction as a reason for the rejection. The decision comes after discussions with photographer Nan Goldin, an anti-opioid activist who stated she wouldn't participate in a gallery retrospective if the Sackler money was accepted.

Gallery's Process

The Gallery had considered the donation for over a year. Their ethics advisory committee, consulted following Goldin's public statements, provided confidential advice that influenced the final decision.

Overall Impact

The rejection reflects a changing climate within the art world regarding acceptance of donations from entities associated with the opioid crisis. It highlights the growing pressure on institutions to consider ethical implications alongside financial contributions.

Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

LONDON — Britain’s National Portrait Gallery said Tuesday that it was not accepting a long-discussed $1.3 million donation from a charitable arm of the Sackler family.

The decision, reached by mutual agreement between the gallery and the Britain-based Sackler Trust, is the latest sign of the changing climate in the art world toward the family, which has links to the opioid crisis. Members of the family own Purdue Pharma, which makes OxyContin.

“The allegations against family members are vigorously denied, but to avoid being a distraction for the National Portrait Gallery, we have decided not to proceed at this time with the donation,” the Sackler Trust said in a statement.

“We understand and support their decision not to proceed at this time with the donation,” David Ross, the National Portrait Gallery’s chairman, said in a statement.

The Gallery had been considering the gift for over a year, as the controversy around the Sackler family has grown. Nan Goldin, the photographer and anti-opioid activist, drew attention to it last month when she revealed she was in discussions with the gallery over a retrospective. “I have told them I would not do it if they take the Sackler money,” she told The Observer.

The gallery has an ethics advisory committee that provides advice on whether to accept donations. It met shortly after Ms. Goldin’s comments, according to The Art Newspaper. Its advice was confidential and will not be released, a spokeswoman for the National Portrait Gallery said in an email.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

đź§  Pro Tip

Skip the extension — just come straight here.

We’ve built a fast, permanent tool you can bookmark and use anytime.

Go To Paywall Unblock Tool
Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features

  • Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!

    Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!