Boasberg finds ‘probable cause exists’ to hold Trump administration in contempt for violating orders on deportation flights | CNN Politics


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Judge Rules on Contempt of Court

US District Judge James Boasberg ruled there is probable cause to hold Trump administration officials in criminal contempt for violating his March orders to halt deportations using the Alien Enemies Act. The ruling follows the administration's deportation of Venezuelan gang members on three planes to El Salvador.

Judge's Reasoning

Judge Boasberg's decision, detailed in a lengthy ruling, concludes the government's actions demonstrated willful disregard for his court order. Despite providing ample opportunity for the Justice Department to respond and rectify their actions, the judge found their responses unsatisfactory.

Next Steps

The judge is still determining the appropriate punishment and next steps, offering the Justice Department a chance to respond before proceeding further. This case remains a significant political and legal challenge for the Trump administration and its deportation policies.

Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

CNN  — 

US District Judge James Boasberg ruled Wednesday that “probable cause exists” to hold Trump administration officials in criminal contempt for violating his orders in mid-March halting the use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport alleged Venezuelan gang members.

The judge is still deciding punishment and the next steps he may take, and is giving the Justice Department an opportunity to respond.

The situation has been a major political and legal flashpoint for the Trump White House in its efforts to carry out a historic deportation campaign, especially in mid-March when it sent three planes of migrants to a prison in El Salvador.

“The Court ultimately determines that the Government’s actions on that day demonstrate a willful disregard for its Order, sufficient for the Court to conclude that probable cause exists to find the Government in criminal contempt,” Boasberg wrote in a lengthy ruling detailing his decision.

“The Court does not reach such conclusion lightly or hastily; indeed, it has given Defendants ample opportunity to rectify or explain their actions,” he added. “None of their responses has been satisfactory.”

This story is breaking and will be updated.

🧠 Pro Tip

Skip the extension — just come straight here.

We’ve built a fast, permanent tool you can bookmark and use anytime.

Go To Paywall Unblock Tool
Sign up for a free account and get the following:
  • Save articles and sync them across your devices
  • Get a digest of the latest premium articles in your inbox twice a week, personalized to you (Coming soon).
  • Get access to our AI features

  • Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!

    Save articles to reading lists
    and access them on any device
    If you found this app useful,
    Please consider supporting us.
    Thank you!