Angela Rayner demands tax raid on savers in secret memo to Rachel Reeves


AI Summary Hide AI Generated Summary

Key Players and Conflict

The article centers on a leaked memo from Angela Rayner, Deputy Prime Minister, to Rachel Reeves, Chancellor of the Exchequer. The memo proposes alternative revenue-raising measures, prioritizing increased taxes on the wealthy over spending cuts. This action has caused internal conflict within the Labour Party.

Proposed Tax Measures

Rayner's memo suggests reinstating the pensions lifetime allowance, a move that would increase taxes on high-income earners with substantial pension savings. The memo emphasizes that these measures would not impact working-class individuals, a key promise from Labour's 2024 election manifesto.

Political Reactions

Conservative shadow chancellor Mel Stride criticized the proposal, linking it to the policies of Jeremy Corbyn and suggesting that it confirms the Labour Party's intention to increase taxes. The article indicates that further tax increases may be unavoidable in the Autumn Budget due to challenging economic forecasts.

Internal Labour Party Divisions

The article highlights growing tensions within the Labour Party, with left-wing MPs expressing concerns over spending cuts and potential rebellions over policy changes. Rayner's memo reflects these internal pressures and attempts to offer alternative solutions.

  • Internal conflict over spending cuts.
  • Potential tax increase in Autumn Budget.
  • Reinstating pensions lifetime allowance as a potential revenue stream.
Sign in to unlock more AI features Sign in with Google

Allies of the Deputy Prime Minister have said she has become increasingly exasperated with having to publicly defend Treasury spending cuts and is pushing back in private.

Treasury insiders are understood to be making clear that while Ms Reeves welcomes contributions from all Cabinet colleagues, as Chancellor she decides taxation and spending policy.

The memo looks set to become the blueprint for changes that the Left will push for in the Autumn Budget, amid mounting speculation that Ms Reeves will be forced to raise tax owing to challenging economic forecasts.

Left-wing MPs are increasingly in uproar over the spending squeeze, with Sir Keir Starmer facing growing rebellions over scrapping the universal winter fuel payment and cuts to disability benefits.

On Tuesday, Ms Reeves offered her first public hint that she could change the winter fuel policy, saying she would “listen” to concerns, while on Monday night at a meeting with Labour MPs the Prime Minister was challenged over the welfare cuts. 

It comes amid wider concern on the Left about the direction Sir Keir and his inner circle have taken in recent months, including their efforts to counter Reform’s popularity surge with tougher immigration policies.

Corbyn-style Labour

Commenting on the memo, Mel Stride, the Conservative shadow chancellor, said: “This confirms that we are still living with the Labour Party of Jeremy Corbyn. At the very highest level, Labour ministers are debating which taxes to increase next.”

He added: “The Chancellor has repeatedly refused to rule out another tax raid in the autumn and now we know why – Labour’s top brass, including the Deputy Prime Minister, want to come back for more.”

There continues to be speculation that Ms Reeves will find it impossible to avoid raising taxes once again in her Budget this autumn amid challenging economic forecasts.

The two-and-a-half page memo is stamped “official” and was submitted by Ms Rayner’s team to the Treasury in mid-March, before Ms Reeves delivered her Spring Statement.

The memo was titled “alternative proposals for raising revenue”. The first line stated that the policies “would be popular, prudent, and would not raise taxes on working people”. The last phrase was a promise in Labour’s 2024 election manifesto.

It offered different ways to raise money, with increased taxes on the wealthy put forward instead of spending cuts viewed on the Left as unfairly hitting the vulnerable.

One idea was reinstating the pensions lifetime allowance, which had placed a limit of just above ÂŁ1 million on how much could be saved in a pension without incurring higher tax charges.

Was this article displayed correctly? Not happy with what you see?

Tabs Reminder: Tabs piling up in your browser? Set a reminder for them, close them and get notified at the right time.

Try our Chrome extension today!


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device


Share this article with your
friends and colleagues.
Earn points from views and
referrals who sign up.
Learn more

Facebook

Save articles to reading lists
and access them on any device