Select An AI Action To Trigger Against This Article

  • Masarani M, Dinneen M (2007) Ureteric colic: new trends in diagnosis and treatment. Postgrad Med J 83(981):469–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha B, Karki D&, Baidya (2009) Jhulaneswar. The outcome of pneumatic lithotripsy for the management of ureteric calculi. Kathmandu Univ Med J 6:355–360

  • Mustafa M, Al Zabadi H, Mansour S, Nabulsi A (2023) Endoscopic management of upper and lower ureteric stones using pneumatic lithotripter: A retrospective medical records review. Res Rep Urol 15:77–83

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Abedi AR, Razzaghi MR, Allameh F, Aliakbari F, FallahKarkan M, Ranjbar A (2018) Pneumatic lithotripsy versus laser lithotripsy for ureteral stones. J Lasers Med Sci 9(4):233–236

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Aldoukhi AH, Roberts WW, Hall TL, Ghani KR (2017) Holmium laser lithotripsy in the new stone age: dust or bust?? Front Surg 4:57

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tang X, Wu S, Li Z et al (2024) Comparison of thulium fiber laser versus holmium laser in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a Meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Urol 24:44

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jones P, Beisland C, Ulvik (2021) Current status of thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: an up-to-date review. BJU Int 128:531–538

  • Rice P, Somani BK (2021) A systematic review of thulium fiber laser: applications and advantages of laser technology in the field of urology. Res Rep Urol 13:519–527

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Denstedt J, Fernandez C, Gabrigna B (2023) Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: is it living up to the hype? Asian J Urol 10(3):289–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont WD, Plummer WD Jr (1990) Power and sample size calculations: a review and computer program. Contr Clin Trials 11:116–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haas CR, Knoedler MA, Li S, Gralnek DR, Best SL, Penniston KL, Nakada SY (2023) Pulse-modulated holmium:yag laser vs the thulium fiber laser for renal and ureteral stones: A Single-center prospective randomized clinical trial. J Urol 209(2):374–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kronenberg P, Traxer O (2019) The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fibre laser-a systematic review. Transl Androl Urol 8(Suppl 4):S398–S417

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tang X, Wu S, Li Z et al (2024) Comparison of thulium fiber laser versus holmium laser in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a Meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Urol 24(1):44

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fried NM (2018) Recent advances [invited]n [invited]nfrared laser lithotripsy [Invited]. Biomed Opt Express 9(9):4552–4568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kronenberg P, Hameed BZ, Somani B (2021) Outcomes of thulium fiber laser for treatment of urinary tract stones: results of a systematic review. Curr Opin Urol 31(2):80–86

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Khusid JA, Khargi R, Seiden B, Sadiq AS, Atallah WM, Gupta M (2021) Thulium fiber laser utilization in urological surgery: A narrative review. Investig Clin Urol 62(2):136–147

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Petzold R, Miernik A, Suarez-Ibarrola R (2021) In vitro dusting performance of a new solid state thulium laser compared to holmium laser lithotripsy. J Endourol 35(2):221–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enikeev D, Herrmann TRW, Taratkin M, Azilgareeva C, Borodina A, Traxer O (2023) Thulium fiber laser in endourology: current clinical evidence. Curr Opin Urol 33(2):95–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad Para S, Saleem Wani M, Hamid A, Ahmad Malik S, Rouf Khawaja A, Mehdi S (2023) Incidence of ureteric strictures following ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy: holmium:yag versus thulium fiber laser. Urol Res Pract 49(3):198–204

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Belle JD, Chen R, Srikureja N, Amasyali AS, Keheila M, Baldwin DD (2022) Does the novel thulium fiber laser have a higher risk of urothelial thermal injury than the conventional holmium laser in an In vitro study?? J Endourol 36(9):1249–1254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tokas T, Rice P, Seitz C, Gauhar V, Somani B (2023) Temperature change during laser upper-tract endourological procedures: current evidence and future perspective. Curr Opin Urol 33(2):108–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taratkin M, Azilgareeva C, Petrov V, Morozov A, Ali S, Babaevskaya D et al (2023) Thulium fiber laser vs Ho: YAG in RIRS: a prospective randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy of lasers and different fiber diameters (150 Μm and 200 Μm). World J Urol 41(12):3705–3711

  • Gupta A, Ganpule AP, Puri A, Singh AG, Sabnis RB, Desai MR (2024) Comparative study of thulium fiber laser versus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for ureteric stone management with semi-rigid ureteroscopy: A prospective, single-center study. Asian J Urol 11(3):460–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandhu AS, Srivastava A, Madhusoodanan P et al (2007) Holmium: YAG laser for intra corporeal lithotripsy. Med J Armed Forces India 63(1):48–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    • Back
    Run Some AI Magic On Article

    Outcomes of holmium: YAG laser vs. Thulium fiber laser for ureteric stones during ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy - a prospective, randomized single-centre study | World Journal of Urology

    Click on the Run Some AI Magic button and choose an AI action to run on this article